Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Has the Supreme Court Shown the Hand of Authoritarian Free Enterprise?
JimSinclair ^

Posted on 06/27/2005 6:48:05 AM PDT by Happy2BMe

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: expatpat; All; OXENinFLA; RobFromGa; Mo1; Howlin; Peach; BeforeISleep; kimmie7; 4integrity; ...
Some are saying this will create a tax revolt due to property owners rebelling against their having no control left over the security of their private property.

Show stopper indeed.

(And the President remains silent in the confines of his domain . .)

SCOTUS DECISION WATCH- Live Thread- 10am

21 posted on 06/27/2005 7:31:31 AM PDT by Happy2BMe ("Viva La Migra" - LONG LIVE THE BORDER PATROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: pookie18


22 posted on 06/27/2005 7:36:11 AM PDT by Happy2BMe ("Viva La Migra" - LONG LIVE THE BORDER PATROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

because you will experience a taking in the form of a Sheriff's sale ...


23 posted on 06/27/2005 7:41:46 AM PDT by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

Good 'toon. Ruth Bader Ginsberg is the Supreme Court Justice from hell. I know EXACTLY what makes this black robed kook tick.


24 posted on 06/27/2005 7:48:27 AM PDT by dennisw (See the primitive wallflower freeze, When the jelly-faced women all sneeze)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
EXACTLY!??
25 posted on 06/27/2005 7:49:47 AM PDT by Happy2BMe ("Viva La Migra" - LONG LIVE THE BORDER PATROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

It is happening in FL.

In a municipality homestead is capped at 1/2 acre.

OUTSIDE a municipality homestead is 120 acres.

If you get annexed you have a grandfather clause protection but the NEW owners get dropped to the 1/2 acre.

This is particularly crucial as homestead property tax increases are capped to prevent taking by confiscatory taxation on the individual owner. So now instead of forcing gentrification by taxation, they can force taking by simply taking.


26 posted on 06/27/2005 7:51:13 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
In other U.S.S.C. Oligarchy News . .

===================================

Court: File-Sharing Services May Be Sued

Court: No Ten Commandments in Courthouses

27 posted on 06/27/2005 7:57:51 AM PDT by Happy2BMe ("Viva La Migra" - LONG LIVE THE BORDER PATROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

Being Jewish, I understand lunatic ideologue wizened cancerous communist NY Jewish women. I've seen her kind many times before though of course not in the Supreme Court. Sadly, she is a shame to the (my) Jewish people.

In short… she’s a communist effin’ lunatic who is convinced of her rightness, dismisses any criticism. She’s in her NY/Washington liberal bubble where all she’ll get will be praise.


28 posted on 06/27/2005 7:59:02 AM PDT by dennisw (See the primitive wallflower freeze, When the jelly-faced women all sneeze)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
FORGET ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT ALREADY! They weren't being "oligarchical" by upholding a law that elected representatives enacted.

The blame for these laws lies with the politicians themselves. WE elected them, we can unelect them. If even a quarter of the anger that's been uselessly directed at the courts had instead been directed at the politicians, there would be heads rolling in city and town halls all across the country. But instead, everyone wastes their energy on SCOTUS, the branch of government that we have precisely the least influence on, and which didn't initiate the problem here. In the meantime, the slimy politicians get let off the hook. Can anyone give a rational reason for this?

29 posted on 06/27/2005 7:59:28 AM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Oh - that one.

(Thanks for the revelations. For a moment there, I could have sworn you were descrbing Hillary Clinton.)

============================

"She’s in her NY/Washington liberal bubble where all she’ll get will be praise."


30 posted on 06/27/2005 8:02:06 AM PDT by Happy2BMe ("Viva La Migra" - LONG LIVE THE BORDER PATROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: inquest
I'm not for one second going to let the U.S.S.C. off the proverbial hook.

They are elitists GONE AMOK!

Their job was to STOP this lunacy. Instead they propagate and legalize it.

(Who are the criminals now?)

31 posted on 06/27/2005 8:04:14 AM PDT by Happy2BMe ("Viva La Migra" - LONG LIVE THE BORDER PATROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
Suggested future SCOTUS nominee guidelines:

NO more Souters
NO more Kennedys
and for God's sake, NO MORE GINSBURGS! (ACLU spawn)

32 posted on 06/27/2005 8:47:32 AM PDT by TheGrimReaper (It's time to bring back public flogging.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
This is what gets me: SCOTUS strikes down state laws, and large numbers of people here go ballistic, to the point of attacking the notion of judicial review itself, damning Marshall for Marbury vs Madison, etc. But then when the court fails to strike down a law, it seems as though these same elements are railing against "judicial tyranny". But the fact is, the courts didn't "tyrannize" us. It's true that they didn't stop tyranny, but that charge is absolutely no more applicable to them than to the people who elected the tyrants at the state and local level. Where's all the outrage against them?

I don't understand why people want to waste anger and energy on the courts, rather than on the politicians where you'll get 20 times more bang for your buck. Can you explain why it's being done this way?

33 posted on 06/27/2005 9:03:23 AM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: inquest
"Can you explain why it's being done this way?"

======================

How difficult is it to impeach a senator or a congressman? An appellate judge or even a district judge.

You know it is almost impossible.

In this nation once for and by the people the Oligarchy now owns The People.

History repeats itself. I fear for our nation's security when private property rights come under such direct frontal attack. This will be a long hot summer.

Thank you for your thoughts.

34 posted on 06/27/2005 10:13:20 AM PDT by Happy2BMe ("Viva La Migra" - LONG LIVE THE BORDER PATROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe; poobear

Free Enterprise? Since when are government siezures free enterprise? I'm getting sick of "moderates" confusing free enterprise and fascism. Free enterprise means people have the right to conduct business as they see fit, without government interference. In free enterprise, government serves merely to preserve the freedom by preventing lawlessness, invasion, and the restriction of markets. New London represents fascism here, the ability of the government to co-erce its subjects into business dealings they do not wish to engage in.


35 posted on 06/27/2005 10:16:08 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Where's Bush?


36 posted on 06/27/2005 10:16:41 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
In this nation once for and by the people the Oligarchy now owns The People.

"The Oligarchy" didn't force the people to elect officials who passed these tyrannical laws, nor did "the Oligarchy" enact these laws themselves. The sooner people start focusing on the source of the problem, the sooner we'll start seeing results.

37 posted on 06/27/2005 11:10:35 AM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

bttt


38 posted on 06/27/2005 11:37:10 AM PDT by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: inquest
No, SCOTUS is without fault! They only legalized the seizure by broading the definition from "public use" to "public benefit". /sarc
39 posted on 06/27/2005 1:56:31 PM PDT by Edgerunner (Proud to be an infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
Forgive me for using such an overused term, but doesn't "authoritarian free enterprise" mean the same thing as "corporatist fascism"?

What's really funny is that I have a loony-left friend who constantly tells me that the country is run by corporations. Who just handed corporations carte blanche to do as they please? The liberals on the Supreme Court. Oh, the irony...

40 posted on 06/27/2005 2:06:48 PM PDT by The Grammarian (Postmillenialist Methodist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson