To: TheOtherOne
Not really - this time an object to investigate was provided - just like the FCC won't investigate without an example being provided. Sorry, I looked this up several months ago (this is a several month old article rehashed) when it first happened - now the group that presented the object also came under investigation for anti-semetisim. It withdrew the request and made a public statement against its own claim. Next time do a little deeper digging.
48 posted on
06/27/2005 11:19:14 AM PDT by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
To: Destro
Not really - this time an object to investigate was provided - just like the FCC won't investigate without an example being provided. Sorry, I looked this up several months ago (this is a several month old article rehashed) when it first happened - now the group that presented the object also came under investigation for anti-semetisim. It withdrew the request and made a public statement against its own claim. Next time do a little deeper digging. Deeper digging? I read the article. Your statement was contridicted by the article. Sorry I did not do independant research, if your additional information is accurate it makes much more sense.
That being said, there is ground between the believing all of the article or none of it.
51 posted on
06/27/2005 11:26:03 AM PDT by
TheOtherOne
(I often sacrifice my spelling on the alter of speed™)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson