I know bachelors who are not gay.
If Dreier's a devout Christian Scientist, he's a very moral man.
That's true. Just because he's a bachelor doesn't mean he's gay. I wasn't saying he was for sure. He is a nice looking man, keeps himself up well. Funny how the dems think his personal life matters to voters.
Personally, I don't think people really want to hear about the sex lives of their elected officials whether they're gay or straight. I think it's more like "Don't raise my taxes. Keep the government out of my hair. Make sure teachers teach my kids about reading, writing, and arithmetic so they can get by in the real world, NOT about "alternative" lifestyles, or putting condoms on cucumbers."
"Maybe he isn't homosexual at all, just the nastiest thing the homosexuals can try to do to him is to claim that he is."
This comment alone sums up what is wrong with this whole thread of discussion. The fact that some of you -- if not most -- believe that homosexuality is something to be ashamed up, that it constitutes an insult or a slur, speaks volumes.
The question isn't whether Dreier is gay; he is. The question is what kind of person leads a double life, betrays himself and other gays, in exchange for power. The Nazi party was teeming with gays, and their sexuality was tolerated, until it became an embarrassment. The ones who were not killed or expelled, went into the closet and became the most ardent and vocal persecutors.
Sure Dreier may share many Conservative ideals, but he is still fundamentally a reprehensible human being, to gays because he betrays us, and to you -- although you fail to realize it -- because, deep down inside, he represents what Republicans hate most: the gay lifestyle. And don't be fooled, Dreier may not march in parades in his district, but he leads a very gay life in Washington.