Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fee
They take original definition for fascism, add to it traits of a conservative society and now are trying to define conservative or traditional American values to be the definition of fascism.

Don't confuse using actual facts or truth, after all according to liberals IE progressives, truth is up to the individual so if liberals (I hate using the term our founders associated with limited Govt) want to redefine anything all they have to do is state the new definition and so it is in their warped sense of reality. They use this new definition to do nothing but criticize for the only goal I can come up with, deconstructing all traditions to implement their supposed new utopia which relies on the assumption of the perfectibility of human nature. Their hatred in some ways stems from their final realization that human nature is not perfect nor can it be manipulated to be such....IMO

5 posted on 06/26/2005 4:42:30 PM PDT by Archon of the East ("universal executive power of the law of nature")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Archon of the East
"Their hatred in some ways stems from their final realization that human nature is not perfect nor can it be manipulated to be such."

Therefore, they just continue with what has become an outdated playbook of useless, empty and incoherent polemics.

No wonder they are consistently inconsistent as well as markedly incoherent.

Take last week's Kelo v. City of New London SCOTUS decision. You would THINK that liberals everywhere would be pounding the pavement, turning out in forceful protest against such a decision! Aren't the Democrats champions of "the little guy?"...the "downtrodden?".......the powerless, voiceless poor and "disadvantaged?" Aren't they against "big business" and the "evil wealthy, both individuals and corporations?"

Not a peep out of liberals about this SCOTUS decision. What if the consortium of landgrabbers had been WALMART? What - exactly - would the difference be, assuming that SCOTUS would have ruled in the same way?

Their silence illustrates their bewilderment on core values and deeply held beliefs. . . . but the "hate" goes marching on without skipping a beat. Whatever the issue, hate is the answer. "War is not the ANSWER!".......but hate seems to be the panacea, catch-all reaction and projection of their own utter intellectual emptiness.

Their general, abiding slogan seems to be, "When in doubt, HATE!"

If I'm not mistaken, the "Bush Lied" and the "Hate Bush" themes were born as soon as these creeps, these feeble excuses for American citizens, realized that Bush was beloved. When his numbers were up to nearly 90% was exactly when Tom Daschle began his sour-faced mumblings about Bush's decisions being "troubling" and "concerning" and "disturbing." It began in small insidious ways, and grew into a shocking, inexcusable drumbeat against this brave, strong and resolute president, and it wasn't that long ago that it was all "concocted" but not in Texas. It was concocted in the center of the Democrat party in collusion with one George Soros. Soros is a world class, professional marxist HATER EXTRAORDINAIRE! He founded the hate fest against this president. I'd love to see how each one of these two men comes out, when history tells the story.

Soros will be a sorry little footnote at the bottom of some page. George W. Bush will be one of the five greatest American presidents: Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln, Reagan and Bush.

Thanks for your comments, Archon.

Char :)

8 posted on 06/26/2005 5:30:56 PM PDT by CHARLITE (I propose a co-Clinton team as permanent reps to Pyonyang, w/out possibility of repatriation....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson