Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Liz
I personally am just completely amazed, not only that the court decided what it did, but that they used classic socialism as justification to justify it. Justice Stevens actually wrote that the city could confiscate homes because it was in the "public interest" and because they were using "careful planning." In other words, the common good, implemented through central planning. It couldn't be more obvious and it couldn't be more shocking.

To me, this means that the court has decided that working toward the common good, the means to be decided by higher authority, is now the guiding principle of the USA. Farewell to individual rights, personal liberty and all that. Farewell to the USA, as we once knew her.

I have never in my life suffered a greater loss of faith in our government.

64 posted on 06/26/2005 6:55:48 AM PDT by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sam Cree

And there is nothing to indicate this applies to just land. They could take a dog, a cat, or a Picasso painting ("we do need items for our nice museum").


91 posted on 06/26/2005 1:56:31 PM PDT by The Red Zone (Florida, the sun-shame state, and Illinois the chicken injun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson