[Liz]

It amazes me that the USSC Five had no vision as to the several collateral effects of the onerous decision.

[TXBSAFH]

This is the second worst decision the supreme ourt has ever made, second only to Roe V Wade.

[skimbell]

Hell they knew that this was coming. Why do you suppose that limp-wristed sissy SCJ Kennedy just had a hissy-fit about lawyers defending judges when they make bad/crooked/illegal decisions. Kennedy more or less insisted that local Bar Associations had a "responsibility" to bend the little people over and instruct them as to how the law really works.

Is there really any wonder as to why these bogus judges keep trying to do away with the 2nd Amendment?

[alice_in_bubbaland]

I think that the USSC-5's lack of foresight is very, very disturbing. Not just in this ruling but in future ones as well.

[oblomov]

"Unintended consequences" does not exist in the vocabulary of liberals. They judge government action only by its intentions.

[Sam Cree]

"It amazes me that the USSC Five had no vision as to the several collateral effects of the onerous decision."

I don't understand this either. I don't understand why those five don't give a damn about the basic philosophical issues, but I also can't get over the fact that they could make a ruling that is such an obvious invitation to graft and corruption. If nothing else, the founding fathers were very alert to these kinds of dangers.