Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: goldstategop
That's making many advertisers nervous, though they insist they work with subcontractors and often don't know about any adware use until they get a complaint.

"There's plausible deniability at each tier," said Chris King, product marketing manager at anti-spyware vendor Blue Coat Systems Inc.

But watch these yawning, lugubrious corporations pop a legal cork with extreme promptness if somebody tries to profit unfairly off of their names.

2 posted on 06/25/2005 1:02:12 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck
Yep. They don't care how they're marketed but let someone infringe on their copyright or patent marks and they let loose the legal brigades. Deniability, my ass. All too often it seems the only value that counts in Corporate America is the bottom line.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
3 posted on 06/25/2005 1:05:00 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: HiTech RedNeck
All the company has to do is have in the contract the advertiser signs - NO ADWARE and that the advertiser will be held responsible if they do - and presto, there won't be anymore adware in these companies names anymore.

Duh...

5 posted on 06/25/2005 1:26:29 AM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson