Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Freeport moves to seize 3 properties-Court's decision empowers the city to acquire the site...
www.chron.com/ ^ | June 23, 2005, 11:35PM | THAYER EVANS

Posted on 06/24/2005 8:16:19 PM PDT by InvisibleChurch

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-126 next last
To: InvisibleChurch

If this were my property the project would suffer a number of not-so-mysterious fires and equipment sabotage.


101 posted on 06/25/2005 4:01:18 PM PDT by Zeroisanumber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg
I believe the opinion is wrong but that's not the point. An erroneous opinion does not come anywhere near justifying condeming the ED concept. The "no" that you're ranting about says that no private property shall be subject to ED except for: (1) a public purpose, and (2) upon payment of just compensation. I've read the opinion of the court and find that the decision turned on the court's deference to local government's determination of what constitutes a "public purpose."

It's more than slightly ironic, and really strange, that the same court that virtually eliminated the concept of federalism/states' rights with their decisions in the 2000 election and the medical marijuana cases (as well as a couple of others), now finds that states and local governments are better at determining the definition of a public pupose than the common sense of everyone else.

102 posted on 06/25/2005 4:28:55 PM PDT by middie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

HA! That's rich. Link bookmarked for plenty of future reference, the way things are going! Thanks, Blackbird.


103 posted on 06/25/2005 6:29:57 PM PDT by BlackbirdSST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
CJ, meet grip! Get one. Blackbird.
104 posted on 06/25/2005 6:32:53 PM PDT by BlackbirdSST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

That is REALLY depressing.


105 posted on 06/25/2005 10:19:52 PM PDT by little jeremiah (A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
BlackbirdSST: Dirty tricks is as good a place to start as any . . .

Cultural Jihad: Sure, if anyone is interested in Nazi-like intimidation tactics.

Dirty tricks preceded Nazi Germany by hundreds, perhaps thousands of years.

106 posted on 06/25/2005 10:47:30 PM PDT by judgeandjury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad

"The public good is always being served when jobs and industry are created."

Put on your thinking cap and see if you can discern the difference between "public use" (our Constitution) and "public good" (the Hillary Klinton Manifesto). It isn't difficult but you must make an effort.


107 posted on 06/26/2005 12:47:34 AM PDT by beelzepug (powder, patch, ball...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: calenel

I think it's past time worrying about the
next S. Ct. nominations; that won't help
soon enough.


108 posted on 06/26/2005 1:45:34 AM PDT by cycjec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: calenel
Anybody out there still think the next few SCOTUS nominations aren't important?

Haven't you heard? Hildabeast gets to pick the next 3 or 4 SCOTUS justices.

President Bush will be unable to confirm any of his nominations past the U.S. Senate. So he will have recess appointments.

Then the Hildabeast gets elected and the Tyranny of Judiciary emerges into a new level that we cannot possibly imagine at this point.

And yes, Big Brother is watching us.

109 posted on 06/26/2005 1:51:52 AM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad

I'll be sure to break out the Crayolas.

A marina is about as elite as you can get!


110 posted on 06/26/2005 5:16:33 AM PDT by sauropod (Polite political action is about as useful as a miniskirt in a convent -- Claire Wolfe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: judgeandjury; BlackbirdSST
Indeed, Nazi-like intimidation tactics had preceded Nazi Germany by many years, but that is not the point. BlackbirdSST's crass statement essentially called for trespass and criminal mischief, and was crafted not for conservatives, but for impotent, thoughtless people who are empowered only for lashing out in anger.
111 posted on 06/26/2005 8:31:47 AM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
Indeed, Nazi-like intimidation tactics had preceded Nazi Germany by many years, but that is not the point. BlackbirdSST's crass statement essentially called for trespass and criminal mischief, and was crafted not for conservatives, but for impotent, thoughtless people who are empowered only for lashing out in anger.

CJ, it's more like What goes around comes around. Another one, Fight fire with fire! Another one, Screw me, Screw you! See the big picture yet? Blackbird.

112 posted on 06/26/2005 8:43:39 AM PDT by BlackbirdSST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad

BTW CJ, where do you live? I know a couple of Property Developer's that might want what you have, you know, for the Public Good and all! Don't be coy, I just want to give back what you seem so interested in foisting on the rest of US. Blackbird.


113 posted on 06/26/2005 8:46:41 AM PDT by BlackbirdSST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

"any hints?"

If and when this situation arises in your town, stand in solidarity with the folks who are getting thrown out. Make them haul not just Granny in her rocking chair out of the house, but 1000 other folks too. Do that each and every time, everywhere in the country.


114 posted on 06/26/2005 8:55:43 AM PDT by poindexter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BlackbirdSST
No, your blustery statement was more like: "Fight representative democracy and the rule of law with threats of violence and intimidation!"

But let's be clear. You yourself would never run out to an elected official's home and smear it with fish entrails. That job of bravely acting upon your own deeply-held convictions invariably belongs to someone else. The Salon Bolsheviki are more than happy to advocate that others act with threats of violence and intimidation.

115 posted on 06/26/2005 10:36:25 AM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
Just know that everybody reading your posts on this subject understand that you are advocating the forcible transference of property from one private entity to another.
116 posted on 06/26/2005 10:57:57 AM PDT by mthom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

bttt


117 posted on 06/26/2005 11:03:36 AM PDT by firewalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad

how odd that someone with a handle of Cultural Jihad doesn't understand "civil disobedience".


118 posted on 06/26/2005 11:23:21 AM PDT by lrb111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
So, I'm left to believe you don't see the bigger picture. You also don't want to back up your statist blather with anything demonstrative, like telling me where you live so I can direct my Developer buddies to your property. That's a pretty gutless stand you take there CJ.

But let's be clear. You yourself would never run out to an elected official's home and smear it with fish entrails. That job of bravely acting upon your own deeply-held convictions invariably belongs to someone else. The Salon Bolsheviki are more than happy to advocate that others act with threats of violence and intimidation.

No bub, I don't send anyone out to do my dirty work, rather presumptious of you. I just want to see you'll put your mouth where your property is. You're happy to have it befall on others, just not yourself. What City Council do you sit on? Long live the State. See I've been converted! Blackbird.

119 posted on 06/26/2005 11:53:18 AM PDT by BlackbirdSST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

Greetings, all! Have you noticed how few to NO community, or more importantly, national leaders, Republican/Democrat, liberal/conservative have come to the defense or condemnation of the Supreme Court's erosion of our 5th Amendment rights last week?

Thomas Jefferson had THIS to say --

"To consider the judges (the legal industry) as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions [is] a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges (the legal industry) are as honest as other men and not more so. They have with others the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps. Their maxim is boni judicis est ampliare jurisdictionem [good justice is broad jurisdiction], and their power the more dangerous as they are in office for life and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots. It has more wisely made all the departments co-equal and co-sovereign within themselves."
—Thomas Jefferson to William C. Jarvis, 1820. ME 15:277

Then --

"In denying the right [the Supreme Court usurps] of exclusively explaining the Constitution, I go further than [others] do, if I understand rightly [this] quotation from the Federalist of an opinion that 'the judiciary is the last resort in relation to the other departments of the government, but not in relation to the rights of the parties to the compact under which the judiciary is derived.' If this opinion be sound, then indeed is our Constitution a complete felo de se [act of suicide]. For intending to establish three departments, coordinate and independent, that they might check and balance one another, it has given, according to this opinion, to one of them alone the right to prescribe rules for the government of the others, and to that one, too, which is unelected by and independent of the nation. For experience has already shown that the impeachment it has provided is not even a scare-crow . . . The Constitution on this hypothesis is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, which they may twist and shape into any form they please."
—Thomas Jefferson to Spencer Roane, 1819. ME 15:212

Catch that last line again: "The Constitution on this hypothesis is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, which they may twist and shape into any form they please."

As I've been saying for so long, "It's the legal industry, stupid." They've been playing us against each other while they've quietly been taking control.

Regrettably, it appears that except for local and national "conservative" talk-show hosts, the nation has been lulled back to sleep.

Nevertheless, we've still got our flag upside down for the fourth. Take care, all!

HDRabon


120 posted on 06/26/2005 4:09:21 PM PDT by hdrabon (No surprise here!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-126 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson