To: edsheppa
You didn't read anything at that last link I provided, did you? If you had, you would not be making such an ill-informed comment.
And...
co·prod·uct n. A product produced together with another product.
Ethanol is but 1 coproduct of the process of making ethanol.
69 posted on
06/24/2005 9:18:00 PM PDT by
Keith in Iowa
(Life's a beach - and Liberals are like the sand that gets in your swimsuit...)
To: Keith in Iowa
I did read ... enough. You did notice that I posted content from it? My "ill informed comment" was taken from that link.
It is ridiculous to claim that ethanol production is a co-product of corn processing and therefore should only be charged with the energy that was used to turn it into ethanol. The fair "charge" would be calculated as follows: compute the value of the labor and materials and subsidies that go into growing a bushel of corn. Then add in the labor and materials and subsidies that go into converting that bushel into ethanol. Attribute that total cost to the ethanol in proportion to its economic fraction of the result. *That* is fair.
You grow corn Keith? Work for ADM or something?
70 posted on
06/24/2005 11:51:40 PM PDT by
edsheppa
To: Keith in Iowa
All of the products your link shows, require additional processing, something the link didn't include.
state of the art farming?
state of the art distilling?
Sure sounds like increased costs to me.
117 posted on
06/27/2005 6:46:50 AM PDT by
Graycliff
(Long haired freaky people, need not apply.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson