Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brilliant

McClintock proposed a new amendment to reestablish our private property rights that this scumbag has stolen from us.

What kept me up until 6:30 this morning was the thought:

How can this new amendment be worded any more clearly than the 5th amendment was?


50 posted on 06/24/2005 1:28:51 PM PDT by stands2reason (GINOBILI and HORRY are my MVPS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: stands2reason

Just get rid of the idiots and reverse their opinions. We don't need to change the Constitution, except insofar as it is necessary to do so in order to get rid of them and reverse their opinions.


67 posted on 06/24/2005 1:32:16 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: stands2reason

...How can this new amendment be worded any more clearly than the 5th amendment was? ...

And what good would it do if it were? The 5 commies in black robes would just declare it unconstituional, or twist the words to mean something other then what they are.

They have really been on a terror here lately. Their butts need to be impeached.


95 posted on 06/24/2005 1:41:52 PM PDT by planekT (SCOTUS has sold us out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: stands2reason
How can this new amendment be worded any more clearly than the 5th amendment was?

Simple, we start the Amendment with the following words, "The court, judges, magistrates, lawyers and court clerks are barred from ruling on this Amendment..."

250 posted on 06/25/2005 2:49:14 AM PDT by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson