To: Crackingham
Boy, was it a mistake to place this guy on the SC.
2 posted on
06/24/2005 1:14:50 PM PDT by
My2Cents
To: My2Cents
Boy, was it a mistake to place this guy on the SC.The saddest thing is that he replaced Robert Bork. What a damn shame.
34 posted on
06/24/2005 1:25:03 PM PDT by
BTHOtu
To: My2Cents
He endorses the new global government with it's laws, and believes that the Constitution is irrelevant.
60 posted on
06/24/2005 1:31:05 PM PDT by
NRA2BFree
(I don*t know what the future holds, but I know who holds the future. His name is Jesus Christ....)
To: My2Cents
If you REALLY want to be angry, remember that that SHOULD have been BORK's seat, if memory serves.
Dan
124 posted on
06/24/2005 1:53:46 PM PDT by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: My2Cents
Justice Kennedy: act responsibly you wont get verbally attacked.
This is a strange guy. He was nominated in 1987 and until 2003 was quite a good justice. What in the world happened since 2003?????
To: My2Cents
To: My2Cents
Boy, was it a mistake to place this guy on the SC.Ditto that. All the sagacity of a small town shyster. Personally, I've had about enough out of these arrogant unelected oligarchs. The Founders never had this high priesthood in mind for the SC-- it is a malignant excrescence of the specious credendum of judicial supremacy.
To: My2Cents
As a justice you are signing your name to history. If criticism hurts too much find another line of work.
258 posted on
06/25/2005 5:36:15 AM PDT by
jimfree
(Freep and ye shall find.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson