Skip to comments.
Justice Kennedy: Lawyers Must Defend Judiciary From Attacks
AP ^
| 6/24/05
| Mike Schneider
Posted on 06/24/2005 1:13:50 PM PDT by Crackingham
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-307 next last
To: Crackingham
Boy, was it a mistake to place this guy on the SC.
2
posted on
06/24/2005 1:14:50 PM PDT
by
My2Cents
To: Crackingham
Half the Supreme Court is full of idiots . Defend that.
3
posted on
06/24/2005 1:15:43 PM PDT
by
Blogger
To: Crackingham
"When judges are attacked unfairly, it's proper for the bar over the course of time, in a professional and elegant way, to explain to the public the meaning of the rule of the law," Kennedy told several hundred lawyers attending the Florida Bar's annual meeting. Translation: "You peons aren't smart enough to understand our brilliant legal minds"
4
posted on
06/24/2005 1:15:44 PM PDT
by
So Cal Rocket
(Proud Member: Internet Pajama Wearers for Truth)
To: Crackingham
Impeachment is necessary and needed. It was never meant by the Founders to be an occasional once in a blue moon solution. The Founders expected impeachment would be needed on a regular basis to properly guard our freedoms.
5
posted on
06/24/2005 1:16:30 PM PDT
by
ikka
To: Crackingham
"Judicial independence is so that a judge can do what he has to do or what she must do," Kennedy said.
I guess that's an adequate explanation of penumbras, emanations, and the need to resort to international law when there's nothing in US law to justify your decisions.
6
posted on
06/24/2005 1:16:31 PM PDT
by
A Balrog of Morgoth
(With fire, sword, and stinging whip I drive the RINOs in terror before me.)
To: Crackingham
When is Justice Kennedy's feeding tube going to be disconnected. He is obviously brain dead. Then we can take his family's property and put up a condo or maybe a WalMart on it.
7
posted on
06/24/2005 1:16:58 PM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Bork should have had Kennedy's USSC seat and Kelo v. New London would have gone the other way.)
To: Crackingham
Patriots must defend American from judiciary attacks.
To: Crackingham
I'm a lawyer, and my inclination is to pile on. The courts are engaged in the most collossal abuse of power ever witnessed in this country since its founding. The current Supreme Court should be removed from the bench by Constitutional amendment, and every decision rendered by it since 1965 should be declared without precedental value.
9
posted on
06/24/2005 1:17:51 PM PDT
by
Brilliant
To: Crackingham
It seems to me that this statement
Some critics believe that the idea of judicial independence gives judges the ability to rule however they want to, but the opposite is true, Kennedy said.
is contradicted by this one:
"Judicial independence is so that a judge can do what he has to do or what she must do," Kennedy said.
To: Crackingham
Lawyers should speak up and explain the judicial process when judges come under attack, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy told members of the Florida Bar on Friday. Ain't enough lawyers in the world to keep me from saying what I think of you, Kennedy. You've earned every word of scorn I can heap on your sorry usurping scalp.
11
posted on
06/24/2005 1:17:59 PM PDT
by
dirtboy
(Drool overflowed my buffer...)
To: Crackingham
Oh, yeah! Sure!
Rule 1. How can you tell when a lawyer is lying?
When his/her lips are moving.
Rule 2. What is a judge?
An attorney in a robe.
12
posted on
06/24/2005 1:18:04 PM PDT
by
Ramonan
(Honor does not go out of style.)
To: Crackingham
And this comes on the heels of the Eminent Domain decision because... Anyone, anyone?
;(
13
posted on
06/24/2005 1:18:07 PM PDT
by
Frank_Discussion
(May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
To: Crackingham
Isn't Justice Kennedy the one who looks to "international law" and Europe to determine how he should decide opinions on U.S. law?
To: Crackingham
What is worrisome is when the criticism isn't just focused on a decision but at the judiciary, and increasingly, individual judges Kennedy believes judges are infallible.
15
posted on
06/24/2005 1:18:48 PM PDT
by
NautiNurse
("I'd rather see someone go to work for a Republican campaign than sit on their butt."--Howard Dean)
To: Crackingham
Some critics believe that the idea of judicial independence gives judges the ability to rule however they want to, but the opposite is true, Kennedy said. "Judicial independence is so that a judge can do what he has to do or what she must do," Kennedy said.
What you had to do was uphold the 5th Amendment in Kelo v. New London. You failed miserably.
16
posted on
06/24/2005 1:19:05 PM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Bork should have had Kennedy's USSC seat and Kelo v. New London would have gone the other way.)
To: Crackingham
"Lawyers should speak up and explain the judicial process when judges come under attack, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy told members of the Florida Bar on Friday."
My trust for lawyers ranks right up there with the judiciary.
17
posted on
06/24/2005 1:19:24 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(I zot trolls for fun and profit.)
To: Crackingham
What is worrisome is when the criticism isn't just focused on a decision but at the judiciary, and increasingly, individual judges, he said. Lawyers can act as an intermediary between the decisions made by judges and the larger society by explaining, he added. What? Explaining that 50% of the Court is nuts? I don't need a lawyer to tell me that!
18
posted on
06/24/2005 1:19:33 PM PDT
by
Dr.Syn
To: Crackingham
Justice Kennedy: Lawyers Must Defend Judiciary From Attacks Any more decisions like yesterday and those lawyers will need armor and air support.
19
posted on
06/24/2005 1:19:55 PM PDT
by
Freebird Forever
(Imagine if islam controlled the internet.)
To: Crackingham
He sounds scared. Well, maybe he had better think twice about being an ACTIVIST judge, if he doesn't like the activism his decisions create. Is he saying that us idiots out here are suppose to sit down and shut up once the Almighty speak from the big white building in DC.
20
posted on
06/24/2005 1:20:14 PM PDT
by
marty60
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-307 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson