[kpp_kpp]

one can hope you're right on your interpretation but the dissent itself disagrees with you.

even under your interpretation this is a immeasurable loss for private property rights upon which most of our other rights are derived.

[krazyrep]

It would be more helpful if you stated how the dissent supposedly disagrees.

And I quite agree it IS a huge loss for private ownership, but the case itself quite clearly deals with a large parcel of property, not merely an individual lot within a larger untouched area.