[Bring Back Old Sparky]

What I am having a hard time understanding is why are the liberals not howling about this. If you seize a number of $40,000 houses to build a golf course and $1,000,000 houses, isn't that a transfer from the poor to the rich?

Boortz seems to think that it might be a fair trade to allow Hillary to become president, trading this for Libertarian Party gains (and scaring the crap out of Republicans). I hope he notes that every SCOTUS justice that Slick Willy appointed came down on the wrong side of this issue.

[TKDietz]

Clinton only nominated two Supreme Court Justices. What's interesting to note is that three of the five in the majority were appointed by Republicans, Justices Stevens, Souter, and Kennedy.

[Freebird Forever]

What I am having a hard time understanding is why are the liberals not howling about this.

Some of them are. Last night on his radio program Alan Colmes was trashing "his favorite SC judge" Stevens and this ruling.

It was strangely unsettling to find myself agreeing with anything uttered by Colmes.

[Eva]

The liberals are just as upset by this ruling as we are, just take a look at DU.

[CGVet58]

they are. ck out the DU, I don't know which surprises them more, that their "liberal champions" pulled this outrage, or that they are in agreement with us Freepers.

But that's all the libs will do; they're sheep, remember? Or perhaps, lemmings is the better description...