To: PatrickHenry
What is the explanation these folks have for why the theory of evolution has essentially stagnated since Darwin's time with any scientists who dare to question some of the sillier premises like the "tree of life" being marginalized as religious zealots, even if they aren't religious at all? Just wondering.
77 posted on
06/24/2005 1:06:29 PM PDT by
Cinnamon Girl
(OMGIIHIHOIIC ping list)
To: Cinnamon Girl
What is the explanation these folks have for why the theory of evolution has essentially stagnated since Darwin's time with any scientists who dare to question some of the sillier premises like the "tree of life" being marginalized as religious zealots, even if they aren't religious at all? Just wondering. The The Tree of Life isn't a premise; it's a conclusion, based on the evidence, that all life is related by common descent. Let's hear how you would arrange that evidence to support a different conclusion. We're very open-minded around here. I'd like to know your views. Just wondering.
81 posted on
06/24/2005 1:14:23 PM PDT by
PatrickHenry
(Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas. The List-O-Links is at my homepage.)
To: Cinnamon Girl
What is the explanation these folks have for why the theory of evolution has essentially stagnated since Darwin's time...The theory hasn't stagnated, thus no explanation would be helpful.
85 posted on
06/24/2005 1:17:48 PM PDT by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson