[WhiteKnight]

Perhaps by first accepting that there are holes in a theory, one can then be open to looking at new possibilities.

Great question, but a better one would be; what is the "theory of evolution"? So far b_sharp hasn't been able to (or won't) produce the "theory of evolution". I was hoping he would on a previous thread, but to no avail. In other words, why bother punching holes in something that isn't even good science. The simple fact is, the "theory of evolution" does not pass the rigors of the scientific method and is therefore bad science.

At your service, WhiteKnight

My apologizes for sticking my nose into your post

[b_sharp]

I did post the theory of evolution but you then came up with some artificially contrived version of what a theory has to look like. I determined from your response that you would be unable to accept anything I could present as a scientific theory.

For your information, very few scientific theories would meet your stated criteria.