Sorry that epithet is reserved for BO'R. Savage is really hard to listen to, but does have some good insights on many occasions. When he goes off on his rants, one does have to turn away and try again later.
Who or what is BO'R?
"Savage is really hard to listen to, but does have some good insights on many occasions. When he goes off on his rants, one does have to turn away and try again later"
True, Savage used to be very enjoyable when he targetted libs. But in the last couple years, he has decided to attack conservatives and liberal haters instead, for some reason. He sounds worse than the libs attacking Rush, using childish names along the line of "Push Bimbo". He is simply jealous and wants to sell his books, which he now has to give away during his program. He attacks Bush regularly on everything, which only helps embolden the libs. He would have made a good Judas 1,972 years ago.
I've heard B O'R in the last few days make, more than once,
his usual absolutely conclusive prononouncements on the Klein book to the effect that there was "nothing new in it, nothing new at all" and consequently not worth his or his audience's time. "We don't do smear" etc. etc. I don't know whether O'Reilly had actually read the book, or just skimmed it, or merely talked to friends of his that had read it. I haven't read it either, but a book in which there is absolutely nothing new might also be a book in which all the most troubling facts about Hillary are stated and re-stated again because there are still some who are not conversant with the Clintoon's history and know what to expect from them.