Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"The justices said they were unwilling to "second guess" local officials on what is best for their communities."

But they have no problem second guessing the knowledge of the employers of the local government drones, namely the homeowners. Typical. Well, there goes whatever was left of the "American Dream". I'm so ashamed of SCOTUS I'm literally sick to my stomach.

1 posted on 06/23/2005 3:26:27 PM PDT by Still Thinking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: Still Thinking


This is socialism.


36 posted on 06/23/2005 5:20:52 PM PDT by 4Liberty (Loud music was played at Waco. So are Clinton & Reno = Hitler/Stalin/ Pol-Pot, Senator Durbin?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Still Thinking
This is one rotten decision! It's the liberals dream. We are all renters now. No more right to one's own property than the average Zimbabwe citizen.
37 posted on 06/23/2005 5:52:40 PM PDT by Ukiapah Heep (Shoes for Industry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Still Thinking

Amendment V

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Amendment IX

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.


Amendment X

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.


40 posted on 06/23/2005 6:23:35 PM PDT by Conservatrix ("He who stands for nothing will fall for anything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Still Thinking

I have an idea. Let's get the DC City Council to condemn the Supreme Court building so they can put up a Wal*Mart.


41 posted on 06/23/2005 6:25:52 PM PDT by Nick Danger (www.iranfree.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Still Thinking

I hope someone bulldozes their homes.


42 posted on 06/23/2005 6:27:53 PM PDT by CaptainAwesome2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Still Thinking

Horrible decision.


45 posted on 06/23/2005 6:43:29 PM PDT by ncountylee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Still Thinking
Now, as long as officials hope to create jobs or raise tax collections, they can seize the homes of unwilling sellers, the court said. This "public purpose" is a "public use" of the land, the court said in Kelo vs. New London.


48 posted on 06/23/2005 10:19:38 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Still Thinking

If I am reading this ruling correctly it appears the US Supreme court just made it perfectly legal for the city of New York to sieze the property that the UN is built on for purposes of building a shopping mall.


50 posted on 06/24/2005 8:12:17 AM PDT by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson