Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: maine-iac7

A landlord would be certifiably insane to kick out a good renter! Granted, some of them are, but if you stick to a place run by a reputable property management company they will want you around, year after year, and the renter gets benefits that the home owner can only dream about!


125 posted on 06/23/2005 4:22:05 PM PDT by Boardwalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]


To: Boardwalk
A landlord would be certifiably insane to kick out a good renter! Granted, some of them are, but if you stick to a place run by a reputable property management company they will want you around, year after year, and the renter gets benefits that the home owner can only dream about!

not if the landlord can kick the Renter out and then get someone else on the property who will pay 100's more - duh.

When the landlord is gov't officials - and local ones seem especially susceptible to "puffed up power syndrome" and bribes - are unlikely to be 'honorable and above board" - the little guy will loose every time.

Further, the little guy is not going to have the money to fight the big guys lawyers and money all the way to the Supreme Court - where they would get their heads handed to them in a hand-basket anyway ...and this they ALL know.

this ruling is but a wolf in shabby wool - totally two-faced bunk

People trust these rulers and rulings at OUR peril...

these rulings put us in exactly the position the Native Americans experienced: They were pushed off ancestral lands to others places that were promised theirs " as long as the rivers ran and the grass grew." - Turned out to be as long it wasn't valuable to the gov't...or someone who saw gold or oil or timber or uranium or land for a golf course - and made the devil's deal with the gov't officials.

Are you aware that legally, constitutionally - legally binding treaties - about a third of this country still belongs to the Native Americans? (All verifiable in the Library of Congress) or that much of what is still acknowledged as their legal lands, individual holdings, are 'rented' to others - whether they like it or not - for stripping off all valuable assets , like timber, ore, or running cattle outfits - at pennies, and that even that money is not paid directly to the owner of the property, but the BIA - for the 'protection' of the owners - who are not considered capable of handling their own affairs in their own interests. (do I hear an echo of Hillary here?)

Better read up on the history of this country - it's about to be repeated

168 posted on 06/23/2005 7:10:51 PM PDT by maine-iac7 ("...BUT YOU CAN'T FOOL ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson