Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NCjim; cajungirl; brigette
I just read at tuscaloosanews.com that...

Janssen (the Aruban attorney general) said the elder van der Sloot gave his son and the Kalpoe brothers legal advice, telling them that "without a body there is no case."

Just thinking out loud, but this must occurred before the boys were picked up originally (he hasn't had access since that time). And the fact that PVDS told the boys this raises the question of why would he say that unless he (1) knew they were guilty or had some involvement in "something bad" and (2) he knew that body wouldn't be found.

At that early date, even he might have thought she had just run away or drowned while swimming at the beach...that is,unless he knew for a fact that the body would not be found or had first or second hand knowledge of what was done with the body.

Bottom line...what made him think the body wouldn't be found? The girl might have been just missing...like the runaway bride.

5,052 posted on 06/30/2005 11:17:24 AM PDT by Dark Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5044 | View Replies ]


To: Dark Skies

Post your comments on the new Thread #4.

Because this is the precise rationale that has been made from the get go.

Greta and Mark Fuhrman made similar comments with respect to how they created a "story" before NH was reported as either late or missing.

On the money!
sp


5,053 posted on 06/30/2005 11:23:00 AM PDT by sodpoodle (Newbie, PhD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5052 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson