They had the police with them.
They werre not taking the law into their hands, but leading the law to the last person known to see their daughter.
Doesn't anyone get that,,THE POLICE WERE WITH THEM.
I get it. I was looking ahead as to what they went through since then. Teospi gets it too. Pretends she doesn't. Keeps posting the tired liberal "vigilante".
About 30 years ago, the local sheriff and a neighboring rancher showed up at our house at 1:00 AM, demanding to question our (then) 13 year old son. The rancher's barn was on fire because some kids threw firecrackers into it. I very politely invited them in, offered them iced tea and lemon wafers. I woke our son and my husband. They joined us for the refreshments. We then asked our son to tell them all he knew, or didn't know, about the incident. We knew he was innocent and had been home all night busy with chores and then to bed early. I knew he never left the house because I was up late watching Johnny Carson.
The point is............we acted responsibly and politely to the sheriff and our neighbor. Had our son been guilty, we might have acted differently. Ala the van der Sloots.
Guilt is far more belligerant than innocence.
" They werre not taking the law into their hands, but leading the law to the last person known to see their daughter. Doesn't anyone get that,,THE POLICE WERE WITH THEM.""
I totally agree. I think Beth and Jug did the right thing by trying to question the LAST person know to be with their missing daughter. PVDS should have told his son to answer all the Twitty's questions. To have done the opposite, makes him and his son look like they were hiding something.
I sill think the VDS family got special treatment due to their standing, with those in power. Where's the outrage for the two security guards who were arrested by a posse of cowboys, because the Dutch son implicated them in Natalee's disappearance? Juran and his father didn't give a rip about them, imo.
Roger that with a big 10-4. NSNR