Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pessimist
The city had argued that the project served a public use within the meaning of the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution because it would increase tax revenues

Increasing tax revenue is right there in the Constitution, isn't it? One of the foundational principles of the country? Lemme look, I'm sure it's gotta be in there somewhere.

Well, maybe we should just rely on International Law instead. Or whatever the justices are in the mood for today.

12 posted on 06/23/2005 10:20:17 AM PDT by siunevada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: siunevada

"Increasing tax revenue is right there in the Constitution, isn't it? One of the foundational principles of the country?"

Thanks for pointing this out. Such irony! The original authors of the constitution revolted against onerous taxation, now the new authors (of the living constitution) want to create onerous taxation.


17 posted on 06/23/2005 10:22:24 AM PDT by CSM ( If the government has taken your money, it has fulfilled its Social Security promises. (dufekin))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: siunevada
Increasing tax revenue is right there in the Constitution, isn't it? One of the foundational principles of the country? Lemme look, I'm sure it's gotta be in there somewhere.

I believe one of the reasons for the Revolutionary War was because the people thought they weren't being taxed quite enough.

25 posted on 06/23/2005 10:25:19 AM PDT by bobhoskins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson