It amazes me (but I'm learning not to be surprised by it) that numerous Freepers will castigate John McCain for whatever reason, saying they will never vote for him, and in the same breath talk about how Hillary would get tough on illegal immigration. This is the kind of numbskullery we have to contend with in our corner of the political world.
I don't think very many Freepers would vote for McCain. The election of 2008 will never see McCain as a Republican nominee. While we also consider Hillary Rodham dangerous, the Republicans better look long and hard at who we nominate, because a strong 3rd party candidate will help elect the witch.
"Freepers will castigate John McCain for whatever reason, saying they will never vote for him, and in the same breath talk about how Hillary would get tough on illegal immigration."
Anybody who says Hillary would get tough on illegal immigration is probably a troll. However I'm not so sure I'd vote for McCain. I have no interest in being responsible for a 2 liberal party duopoly. I also have no interest in taking responsibility for having voted for liberal policies. I defend voting for Dubya because I agree with his stance in the War on Terror, I agree with his tax cuts, and I agree with the Federal Marriage Amendement. I would have no way to defend voting for McCain.
But regarding the poll, if McCain thinks he got elbowed by Karl Rove, wait until the Clintondroids take a pic axe to his skull. The media is just setting McCain up.
Everyone is conveniently forgetting that McCain has malignant melanoma which has recurred and I guarantee this health issue will be trotted out AFTER he is nominated.