To: pepperdog
Are you saying that the first and most important question we should ask any candidate is where they stand on this ruling and what will they do to get it set aside?
That's not a bad idea - private property and the ownership that goes with it - this is such a basic principle, and a large part of the foundation of this country, anybody who would side with a private property owner is probably going to have some Conservative beliefs (even if they are a democrat - I'm not choosy at this point).
To: af_vet_rr
Not choosy? LOL !
Sound like this case is going to have some strange bedfellows. Note this entry from DU:
smb (234 posts) Thu Jun-23-05 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #213
219. Oh, Great....
It was the liberal judges who voted 'yes' to this. This scares me to no end!
Yep. Now, the Pubbies have the argument "we gotta get our judges on the bench or else your city council can steal your house any time they want".
The betrayal of the majority in this case leaves the Democrats with no answer to that argument.
Alert Printer Friendly | Link | Reply | Top
There is hope for our Republic!
589 posted on
06/23/2005 5:14:57 PM PDT by
investigateworld
( God bless Poland for giving the world JP II & a Protestant bump for his Sainthood!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson