Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: babyface00

""Again, I don't like the probable results of this ruling, but that isn't necessarily the SC's fault""

You hit the nail on the head there in my opinion. Read my post above #212. The SC decides on the merits of the law. The liberal democrats have become quite adept at stealing property rights. They made the law in Connecticut and they crafted it with proper legal language.

The solution is to do away with liberal thieving government lawyers, not in bashing the SC.


232 posted on 06/23/2005 9:32:16 AM PDT by jsh3180
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies ]


To: jsh3180

The Supremes simply re-wrote the definition of the term "public purpose."

Bashing the Statists is perfectly acceptable. They were WRONG. I don't care which scumsucker local lawyer wrote the local law--the Supremes are WRONG.


357 posted on 06/23/2005 10:54:14 AM PDT by ninenot (Minister of Membership, Tomas Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson