Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jpsb

Nothing new. Local authority (is that the government?) has always had gread control in this regard and were not as limited as are the feds. Control of the local government is extremely important in stopping these injustices.

The issue here is whether the fedgov has the authority to stop the locals. Given that initially the BoR did not cover the states that issue would have never surfaced until after the Civil War.

This is not an example of the fedgov gaining power over all the property in the country. IT must pay market prices.


452 posted on 06/23/2005 9:55:32 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 380 | View Replies ]


To: justshutupandtakeit
No kidding. I don't care for the decision but come on, this is a local issue, not federal. People need to show up and vote in local elections.

We recently (~2 months ago) had a city council/referendum vote in Austin and about 18% turned out. The next day everyone of my coworkers are bitching aboutthe smoking ban but not a single one voted.
493 posted on 06/23/2005 10:16:31 AM PDT by BJClinton ("Maybe his mother loved him, but I've never met anybody who does." - VP Cheney re: Howard Dean)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson