The Conservables (and their allies, the Liberatives) have been against this amendment from the start. Required to give one's name to LEO even though not charged with crime; property seized if it might be valuable enough to be result of drug deal; torture of terrorist suspects or those who checked out the wrong book; seizure of property if the renter used it improperly, etc.
No surprise here; just a small change in the term "public benefit."
I used to be very hostile to 'slippery slope' type arguments (everything is ultimately on a slippery slope). I'm not so sure anymore..
I used to be very hostile to 'slippery slope' type arguments (everything is ultimately on a slippery slope). I'm not so sure anymore..
I used to be very hostile to 'slippery slope' type arguments (everything is ultimately on a slippery slope). I'm not so sure anymore..