[goldstategop]

Hillary may be a die hard leftist but even I have trouble swallowing the idea she's that machiavellian. The voters of New York don't see her as an extremist and this book will only innoculate her by painting all her adversaries as unhealthily obssessed about her sex life and her marriage of convenience with a philandering husband. Americans don't care about who Hillary sleeps with. There are serious reasons why Hillary shouldn't become President but this book detracts from making that case.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)

[Quix]

You don't see Shrillery as Machiavellian?

You don't see Shrillery Antoinette de Fosterizer de Marx de Machiavelli de Stalin . . . de Sade as Machiavellian?

Perhaps you should consider laser eye surgery?

Or maybe an extensive series of courses in psych?

Or a few trainloads of discernment?

I don't know of anyone in public life MORE Machiavellian unless it were The AntiChrist.

[chgomac]

"There are serious reasons why Hillary shouldn't become President but this book detracts from making that case."

Exactly right and here are a couple in no particular order:

Hillarycare is socialized medicine that is opposed by everyone who would be subjected to it

She has a long time anti US Military record in words & actions

[HIDEK6]

There are serious reasons why Hillary shouldn't become President but this book detracts from making that case.

Exactly.

It's like the impeachment.

As soon as the news broke that the House was considering impeaching BJ for his perverted lifestyle, I knew he would get off.

My point was, we're impeaching him for the wrong thing.

Try treason.

There was a much greater chance of getting that charge to stick (Remember the technology transfers to China in return for campaign cash?).