Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah
A dispute over "facts" does not mean anyone at all is telling a lie.

Accusing someone of spousal abuse and attempted murder, without a scintilla of evidence, is more than a mere dispute over facts.

211 posted on 06/23/2005 7:51:07 PM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]


To: malakhi
Problem is the theories concerning those matters were advanced on the basis of "facts" which were reported in other documents.

You may have missed that part. As you know it's OK to speculate about the possibility someone commited a crime without knowing specifically that a crime occurred or that the target of the discussion was involved.

Otherwise, no one would ever report a crime or a suspect!

Ergo, such discussions only rarely could be considered libel or slander in the law. Doesn't mean it doesn't happen, but you'd have a difficult time pursuing a claim (at least in the USA).

In the end we are left with what is, at worst, a dispute over what facts count, and what facts don't count, in a very difficult case extending over nearly 2 decades.

You already know my dispute is with Florida's fascist law that says you can deprive people of water. That's a very dangerous law.

218 posted on 06/23/2005 8:06:10 PM PDT by muawiyah (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson