Why do you believe the autopsy report would be "more non-biased" than statements from a lawyer? Does the autopsy report even cover the same subjects that the lawyer covered in the interview I reference? (Generally it doesn't.)
No, it doesn't. It also doesn't speculate or slant it to represent one side or the other. It only gives medical FACTS and the report does not back up the 'claims' of abuse.
You can believe whatever you want. Me? I would tend to believe the examiner's report before I would the 'claims' of a lawyer. The thing is, on almost every other subject most people would agree with that assessment, except on this one one. Funny how subjective our distrust can be, huh?