Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arizona: Stricter homeschooling regulations in the future?
EV Tribune ^ | By Jackie Leatherman

Posted on 06/22/2005 11:14:18 AM PDT by hsmomx3

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-229 next last
To: Bluegrass Conservative

"So are you against all regulations?"

Those which are not constitutional should not be easily considered. Formal education, per se, is not a consitutional right. That said, true homeschoolers are looking of more for their children than that which is provided by the public schools. Not less education, but rather MORE education.

"What's wrong with setting up standards, so people know what to expect when they are setting up their homeschool curriculum?"

Nothing. But such regulations are set by colleges, universities, trade schools, and employers. The reason one becomes educated is to become a productive member of society, and the destinations the kids find themselves in determine the skill sets they need.


21 posted on 06/22/2005 11:42:05 AM PDT by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Frank_Discussion

"stards"? Wow, gotta get the ol' fingers moving: standards, I meant...


22 posted on 06/22/2005 11:42:56 AM PDT by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger

need a homeschool ping...


23 posted on 06/22/2005 11:46:25 AM PDT by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kokojmudd

Tom Horne isn't going to be much help on this.

Having spoken to him directly on this issue numerous times, his position is clear. On the one hand, he says that he supports homeschooling. On the other, he belives we should have some sort of regulation in place.

Typical politician.


24 posted on 06/22/2005 11:46:43 AM PDT by AZHSer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Nihao

Unfortunately, there are bad home-schooling situations, and there are good ones.

I know of some parents that just don't put their kids in school so they can sleep late and not have to worry about getting their kids to and from school.

Most of the homeschooling parents that I know are not this way, but I know a few are.


25 posted on 06/22/2005 11:56:48 AM PDT by luckystarmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bluegrass Conservative

You think the same people who preside over the failing public schools should set the standards for homeschoolers ?

They have just the formula. (sarcasm) After all, it worked on the kids who drop out of public school at age 16, don't know how to read or do simple arithmetic. But that's OK when the public schools have failures. God forbid homeschoolers should. Homeschooler failures are far more severe than bureaucracy failures - we only affect one family at a time, whereas the government can screw up an entire community all at once !

Your real problem is one that many so-called conservatives in this country have as well. You think a government bureaucracy (it's for the CHILDREN!) has better intentions for each individual than those immersed with the individual.

When will people ever understand that government workers are just people - as fallible as any other ? And more prone to failure simply BECAUSE they are not allowed to tailor solutions to individuals.


26 posted on 06/22/2005 11:58:08 AM PDT by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Bluegrass Conservative

I think having the homeschoolers take yearly acheivement tests is a reasonable regulation.

I know that homeschoolers in California have to take that, and it seems reasonable.

If I were a parent that was homeschooling, I would want them to take the tests to see how they measure up to other kids.


27 posted on 06/22/2005 11:59:36 AM PDT by luckystarmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: luckystarmom

"I think having the homeschoolers take yearly acheivement tests is a reasonable regulation."

Why?

"If I were a parent that was homeschooling, I would want them to take the tests to see how they measure up to other kids."

They do. They just aren't administered by the state.


28 posted on 06/22/2005 12:01:01 PM PDT by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3

How will the government minders in the public schools brainwash these children or prey on them sexually if they aren't monitored by the state? Of course, if this monitoring and testing is done, it will only prove how superior the homeschooled children are...doh!


29 posted on 06/22/2005 12:01:04 PM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frank_Discussion
Right on - the market for skills prevails. Public schools aaren't turning out a good product, yet they want to get their mitts on homeschoolers.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2005-03-16-remedial_x.htm

30 posted on 06/22/2005 12:01:20 PM PDT by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3
District finds regulations for home-schoolers lacking Federal and state accountability laws overlook homeschooled students. Once parents withdraw a child from a school district, they are also withdrawing a student from standardized testing and monitoring requirements. The absence of regulations has landed the issue on the agenda for this year’s annual meeting of the Arizona School Boards Association on Saturday in Mesa. Board members will debate and vote on recommendations that will form the group’s 2006 legislative agenda.

Included in the recommendations: A proposal for the Arizona Department of Education to monitor homeschooled students.

Translation:

Homeschoolers are showing up the goobmint shools so badly that they have to do something to eliminate the competition that is making them look bad and what better way to do it than to regulate it to death and bring the homeschoolers standards down as low as the goobmint shools are.

31 posted on 06/22/2005 12:01:25 PM PDT by Frank_Lee_Speaking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3
". but every other child in the state, whether they are in a private school or a charter school or a (traditional) public school, they have people to monitor them. . . . There is nothing like that for home-school children."

The horrors of a child not being constantly monitored by the state. Well, we are all socialists now. It seems.

32 posted on 06/22/2005 12:03:28 PM PDT by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frank_Discussion

The problem that I see is that you have a parent homeschooling their kid.

The parent doesn't really know how to compare academics with other kids, and thinks it's normal for a child to have trouble reading in first/second grade. If the kid never has any testing, then the parent may not know that the child is in trouble until it is way toooo late to do something about it.

I have a special needs kid, so I like testing to see how she is doing compared to other kids her age.

However, I know some parents of kids in public school who have been told their kids have problems, and the parents are in total denial. Since the kids are in public school, there are checks and balances to help the special needs kids. However, what if a parent is in denial about it and they are homeschooling their kid.


33 posted on 06/22/2005 12:04:43 PM PDT by luckystarmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Bluegrass Conservative

I think it is the compulsory kowtowing of the superiors (us) to the inferiors (them) that has people's collars getting tight.


34 posted on 06/22/2005 12:04:48 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Disregard the law of unintended consequences at your own risk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Frank_Lee_Speaking

Plus, since thay want oversight and that demands a warm body or so, they'll demand funding to provide this oversight, thus providing more money for public schools, more union workers, and more dues for political purposes.


35 posted on 06/22/2005 12:05:21 PM PDT by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: luckystarmom

Then the child is getting a superior education via the tutorial method - something that produced a lot of great leaders and visionaries in the history of this country and the world - in politics, science, and elsewhere.

Who is likelier to use learning methods/curriculums that work - the parent who has choices, or the teacher who is locked into a curriculum chosen by the school ?

Who cares more about a child - the parents, or the bureaucracy ?


36 posted on 06/22/2005 12:10:08 PM PDT by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: cinives

I was a B/C student in public school, with the occasional A. Somehow, though, I made an 1100 on the SAT, no prep course, and a certain Texas-based Agricultural and Mechanical university (to remain nameless) was eager to take me in. I have found that if I am reasonably competent and willing to learn skills on-the-job, that's a very valuable thing. My mediocre Public School performance would belie that reality.

Learning the assembly-line way, via PS, is not the way for all people. Indeed, the flexibilty of HS allows for cementing an idea that needs to be learned, rather than forcing a student to be left behind as PS often does.


37 posted on 06/22/2005 12:12:04 PM PDT by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Frank_Discussion

Unfortunately, many parents do not know how to tell if their kid has a learning disability.

I have a daughter with brain damage, so we know there are issues with her. However, there are lots of kids that just struggle with education, and no one does anything about it.

At least with minimum testing, maybe some of these problems can be caught early on, and the child can get some extra help.

Even with kids in private and public school, these issues still get over-looked. I know several kids that I think have some learning disabilities that the parents are just glossing over. One has their kid in private school, and the parents are basically paying off the school to pass him. He just finished 5th grade, and my brain-damaged daughter that just finished 2nd grade can read better than him.

I also know of several parents in public school that have ignored the teachers when the teachers have told them to hold back their kid. The kid isn't passing, but the parents insist on putting the kid up a grade.

I also know of a parent whose 3rd grade child was struggling in school, just barely hanging on. The parent didn't know what was going on, and the school was not helping. I suggested having him tested, and they found out that the kid is dyslexic.


38 posted on 06/22/2005 12:13:01 PM PDT by luckystarmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: cinives

Unfortunately, some parents are lazy, just like some teachers.

I like the idea of homeschooling, and in fact it may be an option for my children in the future. I am not against homeschooling, but I also don't want kids to fall through the cracks in either public, private, or homeschooling.


39 posted on 06/22/2005 12:15:15 PM PDT by luckystarmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3

When the Arizona Department of Education does as good a job educating children as homeschoolers do, then it MIGHT be appropriate to start talking about the Arizona Department of Education being involved in monitoring homeschoolers.

Until then, that's like having high school dropouts grade graduate students.


40 posted on 06/22/2005 12:15:22 PM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-229 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson