Posted on 06/21/2005 10:22:53 PM PDT by doug from upland
Hillary(!) demonstrating once again the complete and utter contempt she has (as already done once before by her husband) for the legal system and the interests of anything and anyone other than herself.
Now we can all witness (at least through Fox News) the many subtly variegational deliveries that "I Do Not Recall" and "I Have No Clear Recollection Of That" can be stated in one judicial appearance. I mean, bloody 'ell! Documents related to the Whitewater scheme were found in her residence and she is still walking about free.
Oh, yes. Mrs. Klintoon will finally get her comeuppance, she will!
(/sarcasm)
No... ugh.. Yes.. kinda..
Just questions in my mind..
I don't know Peter and have not talked to him..
Although me, being arrogant and cynical is one thing, it was you that asked for questions, that is another.. so I asked a couple.. and would have asked them in person had I been "there"..
Freep mail; answers would do.. maybe they are in previous episodes but was hoping for a direct answer from him.. being the arrogant icehole that I am..
I will be one of the first to celebrate if it does happen, mind, but I am not holding My breath. Good Luck.
I'll be glad to answer the charge of him being a shill for the Clintons. Peter had a history of fighting Castro and the commies in the 70s. He did work with Carter and Reagan. He looked at a former president coming aboard his company as a goodwill ambassador for one year being a good thing for the company. He was not a shill, admits he didn't pay enough attention to what the Clintons were really all about, and made a huge mistake that has cost him dearly.
This is the biggest campaign finance fraud in history. The story will be told.
Keep on Keeping on Doug!
I sincerely hope it comes to pass, never mind the 'glass half-full' attitude. The price of being a realist, I suppose. I will be watching the events play out over time, and please remember Me if and when you develop a ping list for this. As always, I hope for the best but prepare for the worst.
*tips glass to him* Zdravrostya! Here's to the day when first one and then the other of this twisted wife-and-husband couple wind up in orange-coloured jumpsuits!
I'm not chargeing anything...
He was raising money(campaign contributions) for the Clintons was he not.?..
Thats what I am referencing.. my question is why would he do that if he was not a democrat and an apparatchik. Just to make a buck ? or was he a believer.?. If thats not true or if I got it wrong.. how so.?.
All the major corporations give to both sides. He was making a business deal to help his company. To get a former president to come aboard, they told him he had to help raise money for her from his Hollywood pals. Peter had no idea how evil she was. Yes, he was naive about her. He learned the hard way.
You are right, the statute of limitations could be an issue for all conduct that occurred during 2000. As far as the conspiracy between Hillary, Bill, campaign treasurer Grossman and David Kendall relating to the third fraudulent FEC report filed by Grossman on July 30, 2001, with the knowledge of all, and their the refusal to amend the original 2 fraudulent FEC reports AFTER the June 19, 2001 civil suit making against all of them as codefendants and kendall the chief counsel,the statute runs from July 30, 2001.
its critical that the civil suit exposes all the details not exposed in the criminal trial to irrefutably link Hillary with directing the largest campaign fraud on record.
Former Presidents customarily work for companies as rain makers when they leave the white house. corporations do not operate based on political ideologies, especially public companies, they operate on what is best for shareholders. If President Reagan was still functioning in 2000 I would have approached him. The selection was made on global popularity and vitality and travel schedules and that is why I approached Clinton and did him the favor of helping his wife in a senate race. I have offered significant assistance to Ronald Reagan's first presidential campaign and I produced his January 10, 1989 Welcome Home Dinner in Beverly Hills, 11 days before he left the White House.
I am an American writer and internet consultant currently living in Venezuela for family reasons, and I have known Peter Paul for 25 years...Daniel Morgan, PhD
Are you saying you are in fact Peter Paul?
Thanks for the ping!
The freepin democrats are so damn ham handed in everything they do.. its a mystery ANYONE except the true believers or a Moonbat could be fooled by them.. And I can't help but be suspicious of anyone that seems intelligent.. and goes.. Duuuh!.. you mean Hillary is duplicitous parasitical witch.?..
Peter was spending every waking moment trying to build a mega company. He really didn't pay attention. Was the Hollywood crowd in which he worked going to warn him?
because i was surreptitously online from inside a brazilian dungeon when I created five web sites and was communicating with the world in 2002, it was necessary to conceal my identity through nom de plumes. otherwise i would have faced severe retribution for what i was doing
I take it that's a yes, you are claiming to be Peter Paul?
Why did you make detailed claims and sign it "Daniel Morgan"? Why did you make a profile at all?
Are you going to update it?
Just curious...and skeptical.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.