Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Second runway for Lindbergh? (Some call plan outlandish; further study recommended)
San Diego Union-Tribune (SanDiego.com) ^ | June 21, 2005 | Jeff Ristine

Posted on 06/21/2005 6:11:56 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
San Diego has the busiest airport in the US with just one runway.
1 posted on 06/21/2005 6:11:57 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145; microgood; liberallarry; cmsgop; shaggy eel; RayChuang88; Larry Lucido; namsman; ...

If you want on or off my aerospace ping list, please contact me by Freep mail not by posting to this thread.

2 posted on 06/21/2005 6:13:58 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Constructing a new airport a $50 cab ride away from the city in the boondocks will really hurt tourism.

I'd rather fly into Long Beach, rent a car, and see the beautiful Pacific Coast Highway. I've done it, it's gorgeous!

Don't fix what ain't broken.


3 posted on 06/21/2005 6:22:25 PM PDT by japaneseghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Why they need a bigger airport when broadband virtual-meetings and security hassles make flying at all less attractive, I just don't know.
4 posted on 06/21/2005 6:24:42 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

I don't know, I kinda thought relocating the airport 80 miles east in Boulevard was a better idea. /sarcasm


5 posted on 06/21/2005 6:25:08 PM PDT by South40 (Amnesty for ILLEGALS is a slap in the face to the USBP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Why they need a bigger airport when broadband virtual-meetings and security hassles make flying at all less attractive, I just don't know.

Because Southwest Airlines insists on flying 737s. They also have stated they will refuse to move to another airport unless Limbergh is closed.

6 posted on 06/21/2005 6:32:47 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Wasn't the Marine Corps property on the preliminary base closing list? Why don't they wait a few months and see what becomes available.


7 posted on 06/21/2005 6:43:24 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

This would make Pt. Loma into a virtual island. I don't think that will fly. They would have to buy a lot of really expensive realestate and mitigate noise on even more houses.
This airport will stay put and they should give preference to larger planes. Charge the same landing fee and drive the small planes out of the market.
It is so convenient that the politicians have dragged their feet on any change. Now the only possible convenient site is Miramar and the Navy and Corps don't want to give that up. Long Beach and John Wayne are both alternatives that are more convenient than going over the mountains.


8 posted on 06/21/2005 6:54:55 PM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Because Southwest Airlines insists on flying 737s.

Then SWAL doesn't need extended runways.

9 posted on 06/21/2005 7:07:22 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

I was in San Diego right before they announced the base closings, and a lot of folks down there had their hungry eyes on Miramar, best known as the place where much of that chic-flick "Top Gun" was filmed. Pretty close to downtown SD. Mut the USMC wants Miramar. It's southern location is important.


10 posted on 06/21/2005 7:09:49 PM PDT by Land_of_Lincoln_John (Chicago White Sox, best record in baseball)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
They have the room, there are lots of empty hangars at SAN that need to be figured out (EPA). I fly in there all the time, and a 10K foot runway would do for smaller stuff. But, the biggest problem with SAN is the damned parking garage that abuts the Dollar Rent a Car lot, it is right on landing and keeps the airport from doing inland takeoffs. Here is a pic I shot last month, its kinda hard to get perspective, but the plane is about 50-65 feet above the wall. I'd love to be there when the BA 747 or 777 comes in!
11 posted on 06/21/2005 7:28:53 PM PDT by Central Scrutiniser (Intelligent design is neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: japaneseghost

Orange County, John Wayne is closer to SAN, and a lot more fun to fly into and out of! Short runways, and snotty rich folks on the take off path make for fun.

On take off, you sit on the end of the runway, brakes on, engines go to full, the brakes release, and you careen down the runway. Take off is much steeper than at other airports, and once you get about 2500 or so feet up, the engines throttle way back, for a moment you feel weightless. Once you cross over the ocean, the engines are throttled back up, pushing you back in your seat, and off you go. Its real fun in the back of a 757!


12 posted on 06/21/2005 7:32:22 PM PDT by Central Scrutiniser (Intelligent design is neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Land_of_Lincoln_John

Miramar sits next to Scripps Ranch, a very very wealthy neighborhood (my brother lives there), it ain't gonna happen, NIMBYs.


13 posted on 06/21/2005 7:34:09 PM PDT by Central Scrutiniser (Intelligent design is neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

It'll never happen. 1st, It's only one of only two recruit depots where we train scumbags to become Marines and 2nd, its all historical buildings.


14 posted on 06/21/2005 7:43:44 PM PDT by SwankyC (1st Bn 11th Marines Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
San Diego has the busiest airport in the US with just one runway.

A short one with absolutely lousy approaches to boot. I love Sand Diego, but that airport has to go. Yes, it's nice having it close to town, but you have all the room in the world a few miles East to do something nicer and SAFER.

I recall a flight from San Diego to Pittsburgh that ended up having to land for fuel in Detroit after a half-hour landing delay in Pittsburgh due to storms. The pilot apologized for the extra delay, but explained that with a full load of passengers, they could not take on enough fuel due to the short runways at Lindberg.

15 posted on 06/21/2005 7:43:55 PM PDT by Ditto ( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Then SWAL doesn't need extended runways.

But due to the size of the 737, more flights are required. They are limited to by the number of landing and takeoff slots available. There are only so many planes that can take off and land during a day.

16 posted on 06/21/2005 8:17:41 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Upgrade Palmdale and Ontairio before you expand San Diego.

I'm still pissed off that Clinton decided to make the Homestead Air Base south of Miami a National Park. South Florida REALLY NEEDS another airport and that would've been a perfect location.

17 posted on 06/21/2005 8:20:11 PM PDT by Clemenza (Frylock is my Homeboy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

BTW: Have you heard that SW wants to move to Boeing Field in Seattle starting in 2006?


18 posted on 06/21/2005 8:20:54 PM PDT by Clemenza (Frylock is my Homeboy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
BTW: Have you heard that SW wants to move to Boeing Field in Seattle starting in 2006?

Yes. That's typical. They like to operate out of airports that are too small to handle their competitors' traffic in addition to Southwest's.

19 posted on 06/21/2005 8:37:01 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Because Southwest Airlines insists on flying 737s, more flights are required.

Understood. That means more runways, but not necessarily longer ones.

20 posted on 06/21/2005 8:39:28 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson