Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tree of Liberty

I would love to see The President nominate Scalia or Thomas to the Chief Justice position and maybe Judge Janice Rogers Brown to the Supremes. After all, the Senate just voted to confirm her, so what could possibly be the problem?


37 posted on 06/21/2005 4:54:58 PM PDT by gridlock (ELIMINATE PERVERSE INCENTIVES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: gridlock

"maybe Judge Janice Rogers Brown to the Supremes"

I sure hope not, I think much of the criticism that she is beholden to large corporate intersets is somewhat true. The only thing I really like about her is she makes the libs quiver


177 posted on 06/21/2005 5:17:21 PM PDT by Ignatius J Reilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: gridlock
I don't understand what the brouhahah is over the "chief justice."

Last Fed, my students and I met with Thomas for two hours. From what he told us of how the Court operates, the CJ has NO substantial power other than a figurehead. He's one vote; moreover, Thomas said, the Court does NOT confer, debate, or even discuss cases before it until they all do a "go-around" and each state their (legal) opinions. After that, he said, there's 5-10 minutes of discussion, but he said few minds are ever changed, and it's more a "everyone-gets-his-say" kind of thing. It is the OPEN SEAT that is critical.

351 posted on 06/21/2005 6:12:08 PM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson