Bush underlines support for strong Europe

EUobserver.com ^ | 21.06.2005 - 09:43 CET | By Honor Mahony

[anonymoussierra]

Thank you

[anonymoussierra]

"What do think?"Thank you

[anonymoussierra]

"What do you think?"

[jb6]

What do I think? New World Order. Bush is a lot of things but he's no conservative and he's been for a lot of these big world ideas.

[ncountylee]

Chirac and Schröder must be seething at Bush's best wishes message. Class shows through again.

[Guillermo]

The US has been consistently pro-EU since the end of WWII.

It has been the foreign policy of every President from Truman to Bush II.

Reagan was the only President that didn't push for full-inclusion by the UK, but he was still pro-EU.

[EagleUSA]

Too bad the headline does not read "Bush Underlines Support For Strong U.S. Borders"...

[Guillermo]

The idea of a common market for Europe is a good thing.

And, European nationalism = tens of millions of deaths.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out why the US is and has been pro European Union.

The problem with the current EU is that it's become far more than a common market. They seek to destroy all national sovereignty.

[datura]

When it comes to President Bush, don't listen to his words. Watch his actions. While similar, they seldom are the same.

His father brought the term New World Order into the spotlight after it had lain dormant for decades. This President Bush is a globalist - 100% of the time. During the first term, it appeared that there was hope in him being a nationalist. HA. Maybe a Mexican nationalist.

[anonymoussierra]

Translation

"I seriously appreciate US President rather then previous US president. From what I’m seeing, my believe is; US President is more conservative then is being reported: needless his hands are being twisted by politicians. If you think about it; it takes very courageous man to stand up against UN and other political bodies and to decide to wage war."thank you

[anonymoussierra]

"The problem with the current EU is that it's become far more than a common market. They seek to destroy all national sovereignty."!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!THANK YOU

[jb6]

The Fourth Reich was about a united Europe against the eastern Slavs and others. The SS had just about every ethnic group in it, to include the French and British.

[Guillermo]

Oh please...anyways, it was the "Third Reich."

The Third Reich was ALL ABOUT the GERMANIC/Aryan/Nordic race over ALL others.

It was not about a common market, a common currency, and it was certainly never about destroying nationalism.

[jb6]

Yup, that's why Italians, Albanians, Croatians, Belguins, French, British, Spainish, Ukrainian, Greek and many other nationalities were present in the SS. As a matter of fact, the Charlemagne (French) Brigade fought to the very end in Berlin.

[anonymoussierra]

"both of you make a good point"

[Guillermo]

Geezus...if you don't understand that the Third Reich placed the German nation above all others, then you aren't worth talking to, because that would make you ignorant.

All the propaganda in the Third Reich spoke about the "Fatherland" (Germany) and how no one belonged to themselves, but to the Fatherland (Germany). That everyone owed their life to the Fatherland (Germany). That the interests of the Fatherland (Germany) always superceded the interests of the individual.

They never once spoke about them owing themselves to the whole of Europe, to Albania, or France, or Serbia, or anyplace other than Germany.

If Hitler had his way, no one other than absolutely "pure" Germans could be in the SS, but alas, they were running out of troops and they had to lower their standards.

[anonymoussierra]

"And this brings your point #8 which makes sense. Think about it jb6, he makes vary valid point here, its just reverse side now as per EU"thank you

[Dog Gone]

Too bad the headline does not read "Bush Underlines Support For Strong U.S. Borders"...

Every thread is either a Terri thread or a border thread.

[snugs]

Sara we will not let it happen though will we both the UK and Poland wish for free trade but not the loss of our sovereignity. We must remind our governments that NO to the EU Constitution means NO and not allow a cut down or slightly changed one to be forced upon us.

[snugs]

Think you are on the wrong thread /sarcasm