Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Book on Hillary Officially Released! Hillary Camp Wages War to Stop It
NEWSMAX.COM ^ | JUNE 21, 2005 | Staff Writer

Posted on 06/21/2005 1:47:28 PM PDT by CHARLITE

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: mizmoutarde
LOL.....O'R doesn't like 'gossip'

Of course, he's saddled with a sex tapes scandal so he's identifying with her heinous.

41 posted on 06/21/2005 2:31:35 PM PDT by OldFriend (AMERICAN WARS SET MEN FREE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Argus
She will still be in a position of having to prove affirmatively why she should be president. Ted Kennedy fell on that one question, and maybe some other sad facts in his past having to do with possible negligent manslaughter.
42 posted on 06/21/2005 2:32:36 PM PDT by Thebaddog (Dawgs off the coffee table.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mizmoutarde
AFter listening to Klein for nearly an hour on Hannity I have a totally different opinion of the book.

It's well documented and a must read.

We cannot be spun by the leftists in the media.

This is an important book.

43 posted on 06/21/2005 2:32:43 PM PDT by OldFriend (AMERICAN WARS SET MEN FREE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: beckett

So you allow the MSM to spin your opinion of the book?


44 posted on 06/21/2005 2:34:15 PM PDT by OldFriend (AMERICAN WARS SET MEN FREE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
So you allow the MSM to spin your opinion of the book?

Not at all. If you do a "user lookup" on my name you'll find that I cautioned Miss Marple only days ago to remain open to the possibility that Klein might have something more than unsourced allegations of college sexual hijinks, etc., against Hillary. I had hoped that something substantive might be in the book.

But now the book is poised for release, meaning that hundreds of literary types have already read it. And yet none of them have come forward with any red meat that Klein has uncovered.

In other words it's beginning to look like Miss Marple may have been right. Klein appears to have stooped to Kitty Kelly's level. Unprincipled bottom feeders like that by definition cannot provide anything nutritious for conservatives.

45 posted on 06/21/2005 2:45:12 PM PDT by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse

Being complimentary of Hannity is unavailing, he has no brains to apply to his hair.


46 posted on 06/21/2005 2:46:46 PM PDT by middie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Williams

O-realy is a slut. He will do whatever it takes to stay on the good side of Hillery including kissing here monumental behind.
I fail to see a whole lot of difference between BO and Al Franken anymore.


47 posted on 06/21/2005 2:59:57 PM PDT by newcthem (Use Allah Urinal Cakes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: TommyC1
Just a point of information, not a criticism:

It's OCCAM's razor.


Like many olde English words (including proper names) either is considered correct:

Ockham's razor (also spelled Occam's razor, pronounced AHK-uhmz RAY-zuhr) is the idea that, in trying to understand something, getting unnecessary information out of the way is the fastest way to the truth or to the best explanation. William of Ockham (1285-1349), English theologian and philosopher, spent his life developing a philosophy that reconciled religious belief with demonstratable, generally experienced truth, mainly by separating the two. Where earlier philosophers attempted to justify God's existence with rational proof, Ockham declared religious belief to be incapable of such proof and a matter of faith. He rejected the notions preserved from Classical times of the independent existence of qualities such as truth, hardness, and durability and said these ideas had value only as descriptions of particular objects and were really characteristics of human cognition.
48 posted on 06/21/2005 3:15:05 PM PDT by sittnick (There's no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: newcthem

actually someone raised a good point

what if the Democratic primaries turn into a real battle royale, esp since the rumblings are that Dean is not a lover of Hillary either and assuming he lasts that long, OK lots of ifs

as I noted in another post, I met some staunch Florida Democrats who despise Hillary as much as they despite W, I was dead shocked.....

but wouldn't it be grand to see Hillary's fellow Democrats pulling out all this Ed Klein stuff, why not - listen to Durbin and Reid these days making up such silliness vs the Repubs

esp if they think they got Hillary on the ropes

I was thinking too, say Kerry remains delusional and he runs and for some reason he is ahead in the polls, wouldn't it be grand if Hillary pulled out Unfit for Command.....or somehow Hillary finds that missing less than honourable discharge

oh I'd have such fun


49 posted on 06/21/2005 3:23:20 PM PDT by littlelilac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


50 posted on 06/21/2005 3:25:47 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
As Ed Klein argues, character MATTERS...
[FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!]
deconstructing clinton… "just because I could"

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

 virtualclintonlibrary.blogspot.com
hillarytalks.blogspot.com
missus clinton's REAL virtual office update

coming soon! deletehillary.com
[FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!]

 

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005



51 posted on 06/21/2005 3:29:30 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: littlelilac

I knew some dems in 2000 who made it clear they were not Gore lovers but they were still fighting hard throwing elbows every which way to win. Difference between GOP and dems is: GOP are idiots on politics, Dems are idiots on policies.


52 posted on 06/21/2005 3:29:45 PM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Why are they waging war to stop the book if they say it isn't true? Wonder how ole hillereee,billereee feels now? All the crap, lies, proven lies from networks and trash written about our President. Now she can take it. If she can't stand the heat she needs to get out of the kitchen. After all, she wants to play with the big guns doesn't she? Welll then, she has to take what comes with it. She's wanting the top job in the USA...there are those that are NOT going to just let her waltz in there without checking every single thing in her background. She can take it or she can't. Either way...it's gonna happen and has already begun with this book.


53 posted on 06/21/2005 3:33:18 PM PDT by cubreporter (I trust Rush. He has done more for this country than any of us will ever know! :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

No I am serious. The leftist-MSM says they are not biased, they have a chance to prove it.


54 posted on 06/21/2005 3:38:47 PM PDT by Tarpon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Argus

I should point out that William of Occam didn't originate Occam's razor. He just liked it so much, he bought the company.


55 posted on 06/21/2005 3:38:49 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: littlelilac

Those Florida democrats remember Hill's health care debacle, followed by the loss of conrol of the House and then the Senate to the right side of the aisle. They are not in the mood to take any further losses due to Hill's far left wing impulses. Here is hoping Hill wins the 2008 pres. nomination, more dems desert their party or stay home in the general election.


56 posted on 06/21/2005 3:47:02 PM PDT by gpapa (Voice of reason from the left coast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
"O'R doesn't like 'gossip'

"Of course, he's saddled with a sex tapes scandal so he's identifying with her heinous."

Sorry for the late reply to your comments. I agree with this exactly. O'Reilly is trying to come off as just too elegant, polished, professional and "noble" to stoop to what he calls a "hit piece," but the reason is as you've concluded.

His own sex tapes scandal.......and the sizable pay off that he made to "make it go away" is what's behind his refusal to interview Ed Klein on the Factor.

Thanks for your remarks. You've hit the nail on the old head, for sure!

Char :)

57 posted on 06/21/2005 4:01:42 PM PDT by CHARLITE (I propose a co-Clinton team as permanent reps to Pyonyang, w/out possibility of repatriation....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
This has to be the craziest book ever published. Everyone has an opinion about it, yet no one has actually read it.

Everything is, of course, based on various groups' perception of what the book contains, rather than the book itself.

Thanks, but I'll read it for myself and make up my own mind.

58 posted on 06/21/2005 4:03:31 PM PDT by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog

"She will still be in a position of having to prove affirmatively why she should be president. Ted Kennedy fell on that one question, and maybe some other sad facts in his past having to do with possible negligent manslaughter."

That wasn't what did Teddy in, though.

The press rallied to his aid and they had succeeded in squelching alot of the Chappaquiddick talk (just like they have done for the Clinton scandals) but Teddy couldn't overcome himself. He had a big interview with someone on TV -- can't remember who, might have been Rather or someone like that -- and they asked him about Chappaquiddick. Here was his big chance to silence the critics and get it all behind him, but he wound up giving this rambling answer which went on for about 2 minutes, with him saying, "and, uh", dozens of times, plus leaving long periods of silence with him looking like he was totally out of it. In fact, he looked like he was on heavy meds.

Anyway, after that interview he looked like so much of a loser that the Dems turned to Carter.


59 posted on 06/21/2005 4:50:42 PM PDT by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: webstersII
Dude, you have a Vise Grip memory. I bet that you gave the blow by blow of the Roger Mudd interview.
60 posted on 06/21/2005 5:37:32 PM PDT by Thebaddog (Dawgs off the coffee table.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson