I am sure these 3 reporters were very well "screened".
So is that all the information? Why is he hiding it? Is this normal?
Broad access???
I'll bet there are even strings with that
From Michele Malkin:
The Navy said they had over 100 pages they could not release without Kerry's authorization. Did the Globe get that many and are they reporting on all of them? The biggest question of all remains unanswered. What type of discharge did Kerry originally receive? Remember, Kerry had his discharge re-issued after Carter granted a pardon to Vietnam vets.
Then there is this exchange between Kerry and Tim Russert on Feb 7th.
Last week the 2008 presidential hopeful suggested he wanted to review his full Navy file to make sure of "what is in the record and what isn't in the record" before signing Form 180.
"I'm going to sit down with them and make sure that they are clear and I am clear as to what is in the record and what isn't in the record and we'll put it out," he told "Meet the Press" host Tim Russert.
Kerry did not explain his reference to "what isn't in the record," though questions arose late in the campaign about why he received his honorable discharge six years after leaving the service...
I know this will be a stupid question, but:
Why isn't the press (and why didnt they during the election) filin Freedom of Information Act requests for Kerry's Navy files, like they did repeatedly for Bush's TANG records?
At the risk of insulting God's involvement in making all of us . . . with apologies and a request for a special dispensation . . .
what creature in this time/space dimension
shaped the pile of frozen horse biscuits into the ugly excuse for a sentient creature known as SKERRY?
What a pile of stinky . . . BS.