Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Carry_Okie
The same were the economic forces that induced the fall of Rome.

What empire competed economically with Rome? Honestly curious.

11 posted on 06/20/2005 9:43:50 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: 1rudeboy
What empire competed economically with Rome? Honestly curious.

Economically, none. Militarily, plenty. The thing is, my dear "free" trade advocate, military protection costs money that isn't found in analyses of "comparative advantage."

Rome imploded economically until it was unable to finance and staff its own military protection. They had to rely increasingly upon slavery, and imported goods to keep things cheap, and a welfare state to manage the citizenry displaced by those cheap goods and services: free food, entertainment, etc. They had the whole kaboodle we are getting with Americans funding globalization via military protection, functioning as a massive subsidy to outsourcing, essentially socializing the risk to delivery of those goods and protecting those investments abroad on the backs of the taxpayers being displaced by those investments.

Because of the resulting welfare state, without the funds to finance the military, they had to outsource that too, just as is being proposed in Congress now to a standing UN army.

Hence the fall.

12 posted on 06/20/2005 9:57:40 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are REALLY stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson