Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
From the 2nd DCA:

"In this case, however, Michael Schiavo has not been allowed to make a decision to disconnect life-support. The Schindlers have not been allowed to make a decision to maintain life-support. Each party in this case, absent their disagreement, might have been a suitable surrogate decision-maker for Theresa. Because Michael Schiavo and the Schindlers could not agree on the proper decision and the inheritance issue created the appearance of conflict, Michael Schiavo, as the guardian of Theresa, invoked the trial court's jurisdiction to allow the trial court to serve as the surrogate decision-maker."

You can read English I presume? The court is the decision maker because MS has an appearance of conflict. The court ordered the removal of hydration and food. The court is the State.

Is that too hard for you to wrap your small mind around and come to terms with?

201 posted on 06/21/2005 8:12:07 AM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]


To: jwalsh07
I agree with everything in your post.

I disagree with your reading comprehension, in that you concluded the court ordered Terri's death. They did not.

The court ordered that Terri's right to refuse medical treatment be honored.

217 posted on 06/21/2005 8:41:14 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson