Posted on 06/19/2005 8:19:40 PM PDT by CHARLITE
BTTT...
1992 was during MS's caring phase, when he swore to do all it takes for Terri, er, until he got the loot and the new screwbuddy, that is.
Are you serious??
If you actually believe what you wrote in post 137, I feel sorry for you. MS broke many promises, notably his marriage vow.
Yes I am...and he has given her parents the location.
Hasn't this been reported yet?
Not a tribute to her, a tribute to him.
What an egotistical, self-serving, cold-hearted, low-rent creep he is.
Really, I am aghast. Not a snippet of poetry, or a lilting homily, nor a reference to her beauty or value as human, nor a phrase from the Bible, but "I I I" from Michael Schiavo. It's really amazing...
It's really none of your buisness though is it.
Out of all the civil lawsuits they filed (where Michael spent the bulk of the money defending), I don't believe the Schindlers won any. All they did was add five years to Terri's ordeal, while shamelessly exposing their daughter's intimate hospital life to the public via interviews and videos of her contorted face and lifeless body.
Michael's critics always fail to acknowledge that he offered in 1998, in writing, to donate all the remaining money in Terri's trust fund to charity if Terri's parents would honor her wish and allow her to die. They refused.
Judge Greer's comment two years later about a "conflict of interest for both sides" is slightly misplaced. In my opinion.
Build a monument to her if you wish.
Or perhaps a shrine?
He's pedaling a book proposal, isn't he?
Course I wouldn't expect a low-rent type like Schiavo to put something classy, or poetic, or lofty on her headstone.
Not the leisure suit guy, who melted down her wedding ring to make a ring for himself...
Please show me where I have EVER said this was a federal issue. I have always said the opposite.
She's not my relative. But I assure you if she were, I'd make sure she was the subject of her headstone inscription. I wouldn't make it about ME. Schiavo's ego could fill a universe...
Such a saint, you believe every spin his death lawyer puts out. Riddle me this, wouldn't such an extraordinarily devoted husband, giving up tons of cash to simply fulfill a marital promise, perhaps remain married to his wife in every sense until she was gone? His love was so deep he couldn't wait to find a new common-law wife and start a new family. Actions speak louder than words, my friend. you cannot claim this status of sainthood for the guy yet disallow his lack of faithfulness.
It sure does, who'd a thunk conservatives on FR would support a State ordering the death of one of their citizens by dehydration when that citizen was neither accused nor found guilty of anything. Amazing, huh?
As if he'd open himself up to public derision in so naked a manner. He's pedaling a book proposal, so he's ready to cash in now.
And you were wrong, the 14th Amendment makes death sentences subject to judicial review at the federal level. Period.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.