Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

North Korea making 'excuses' for not returning to talks: Rice
AFP ^ | 06/20/05

Posted on 06/19/2005 7:16:39 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

North Korea making 'excuses' for not returning to talks: Rice

37 minutes ago

WASHINGTON (AFP) - North Korean officials "love to make excuses" for their continued absence at six-party talks aimed at ending the Stalinist state's nuclear standoff, US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said.

Rice added that the United States was ready to listen to North Korea when it sets a date for returning to the talks, which also include South Korea, Japan, China and Russia.

"The North Koreans love to make excuses for why they can't come to the six-party talks," she told Fox News Sunday when asked if it was time for Washington to "cool the rhetoric" with the North Korean regime, which Rice has called one of six "outposts of tyranny" in the world.

"The reason they don't want to come to the six-party talks is they don't like facing China and Russia and Japan and South Korea and the United States telling them in a concerted fashion that it's time to get rid of their weapons, their nuclear weapons," Rice said from Jerusalem during her first major Middle East trip as chief US diplomat.

"This doesn't have to do with what somebody's called or whether somebody states facts about the North Korean regime," she said.

"This is because the North Koreans want to avoid the inevitable confrontation, in a sense, with those who do not believe that the North Koreans can have nuclear weapons and that you can have a secure and peaceful Korean Peninsula."

North Korean leader Kim Jong-Il, in talks with a senior South Korean official, said Friday that Pyongyang could return to stalled nuclear disarmament talks as early as July should the Washington "acknowledge and respect" the North as a dialogue partner.

North Korea has demanded that what it calls a US "hostile" policy be dropped before reviving the talks, which have been stalled for a year.

Asked if she stood by her "tyranny" comment, Rice said: "I think the nature of the North Korean regime is self-evident."

"The point is that the North Koreans have been told by their neighbors and by the international community that the only way that they gain the respect that they say that they want, the only way that they gain some help with their terrible economic situation is to make a strategic choice to give up their nuclear weapons and come back to the six-party talks," she said.

"And when they're ready to set the date, we're ready to listen," Rice added.

North Korea became the first country to withdraw from the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) in January 2003, three months after Washington accused Pyongyang of running a clandestine nuclear weapons programme based on enriched uranium. In December 2002, the Stalinist state kicked out international monitors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

The six-party talks hosted by China were aimed at weaning North Korea away from nuclear arms under an aid-for-disarmament proposal led by the United States.

North Korea has rejected the plan and refused to attend the fourth round of the talks in September 2004, citing what it called hostile US policy.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 6partytalk; excuse; nkorea; northkorea; outpostoftyranny; rice
U.S. does not back off. The plot is thickening.
1 posted on 06/19/2005 7:16:41 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; OahuBreeze; yonif; risk; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; MizSterious; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 06/19/2005 7:17:17 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; All

I think Condi Rice just officially called Kim Jong 11 a loser not bother her anymore LOL!


3 posted on 06/19/2005 7:26:05 PM PDT by SevenofNine (Not everybody in, it for truth, justice, and the American way,"=Det Lennie Briscoe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SevenofNine
Re #3

That should hurt "divine" Chia Fruit.

4 posted on 06/19/2005 7:27:46 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
North Korea doesn't like us? Good. That means we stood up for something, sometime important.
5 posted on 06/19/2005 7:29:12 PM PDT by FreeRep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; All

I see what Condi make her hand gestures maybe she find out that how "small" Kim is really is LOLOL! from archives intellgence then Secretary of State Maddy not Too Bright


6 posted on 06/19/2005 7:30:01 PM PDT by SevenofNine (Not everybody in, it for truth, justice, and the American way,"=Det Lennie Briscoe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
for their continued absence at six-party talks

They are backing away from the talks again and blaming the US?

Gee, didn't see that coming.

How long does this "smoke and mirror" routine go on?  They have no intention of actually stopping their nuclear ambitions and these "talks" are just stall tactics until they are far enough along that they can blackmail the world.

7 posted on 06/19/2005 7:49:14 PM PDT by softwarecreator (Facts are to liberals as holy water is to vampires)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Anything they do, in coming back to the table, will be to stall for more time.

They will not dismantle their nuke program as long as Bush is president.

If for example a naive appeaser like Kerry or Clinton can make it in there in 3.5 years from now (January 2009), then DPRK will hold out that long if they have to, starving another 1 million people if need be--and still building up forces and capabilities through their other sources of income.

8 posted on 06/19/2005 8:05:40 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (**AT THE END OF THE DAY, IT IS NOT SO MUCH "WHO" WE STAND FOR, BUT RATHER "WHAT" WE STAND FOR**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: softwarecreator
Fact is, they ARE now far enough along that we have essentially been dancing with them under a state of BLACKMAIL for at least the last 18 months. You don't need to speak in the future tense.

The cancer has grown very extensively.

Hence, while South Korea appeases, WE only bark and threaten and maneuver, but we know we cannot attack without horrendous implications for US civilian and military in South Korea, not to mention downtown Tokyo or US bases in Japan (Nodong, scuds, bombings on the ground by terrorists in country, suitcase nukes, chems, bios, you name it).

9 posted on 06/19/2005 8:08:39 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (**AT THE END OF THE DAY, IT IS NOT SO MUCH "WHO" WE STAND FOR, BUT RATHER "WHAT" WE STAND FOR**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo; All

I am very suprise nobody has post Chia Pet photo from Team America YET


10 posted on 06/19/2005 8:11:15 PM PDT by SevenofNine (Not everybody in, it for truth, justice, and the American way,"=Det Lennie Briscoe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
You're right, we do keep talking like it's something that might happen, when it already has from all indications.

Obviously, I only know from what I read here, and other places, which always offer conflicting reports.   One day they are close ... the next day it'll take years, they have nukes ... they don't have nukes, they have about 20 bombs ... they have no bombs, they are gonna test ... they are years from testing.

I have no idea what the truth is.

11 posted on 06/19/2005 8:22:37 PM PDT by softwarecreator (Facts are to liberals as holy water is to vampires)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I'm not trying to be a troll, but how can countries that belong to the nuclear club compell other countries not to aquire nukes?


12 posted on 06/19/2005 8:30:51 PM PDT by Nachoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachoman
Re #12

It is a matter of what kind of regime has nukes.

13 posted on 06/19/2005 8:35:29 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I would like to know what the American Left proposes for action on this matter...thus far, they have criticized the Bush Administration without offering any solutions to the problem...they fact that they are not offering solutions means that ytthey either do not have solutions, or that they would prefer to keep them secret, which can only mean they would like to see Bush fail.


14 posted on 06/19/2005 8:36:08 PM PDT by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LachlanMinnesota
Re #14

Their approach

Before they declare they have nukes:==>
They don't have one. Just negotiate with them with a lot of goodies before they have real ones.

After their declaration:==>
They have one. Negotiate with them with a lot of goodies before they have more and nuke us. If they refuse, accept them as nuclear power and get along with them nicely, again give them a lot of goodies.

The result is always the same.

15 posted on 06/20/2005 4:29:43 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson