Posted on 06/19/2005 10:34:43 AM PDT by bd476
A strong earthquake occurred at 16:15:15 (UTC) on Sunday, June 19, 2005. The magnitude 6.1 event has been located in NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN. The hypocentral depth was estimated to be 49 km (30 miles). (This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.)
As it is 365 days of the year, every single year, and has been for the past 40 million years or so.
They're called "aftershocks" and the aftershocks to the 7.2 quake a few days ago will go on for YEARS.
Still mystified why people are surprised by this.
I know. People are jumpy since the Sumatran subduction and its aftermath. A great number of Cassandras and Jeremiahs are dancing in the streets.......probably adding to the events.
They're within a fault length distance of the 7.2, and are following a normal aftershock pattern. A 5.0 today in that location today is precisely what you'd expect as a routine aftershock of the 7.2 earthquake of a few days ago.
USGS calls them aftershocks; good enough for me.
OKay, you know more than me!
6.1, that don't impress me much.
I was referring to the 5.0 quake off California this morning as an Aftershock.
The 6.1 quake off Japan has nothing to do with the 7.2 or 5.0 quakes off California; just basically normal activity for Japan.
Since I am out here and you aren't....I say we need to wait another 20 years...
Okay!
Any idea what's causing California to be so active lately?
My husband said that Californina is moving towards Alaska - at about an inch or so a year. Do you agree with that?
My family and I just got back last night from Japan (leaving through Tokyo). My kids were bummed that they didn't feel an earthquake while they were there (missed this one by half a day).
Saw a stat at an exhibit in Japan that, as a country, they have more earthquakes then any other country in the world.
The strip of land west of the San Andreas is in fact slowly moving towards Alaska. However this motion is carried on a variety of faults in addition to the San Andreas, and areas east of the San Andreas all the way to Utah are also moving northwest, though at a much, much slower speed than the sliver of land West of the San Andreas.
This motion can be directly measured year by year by GPS units on either side of the fault, and on either side of the fault the rocks "match up" if you move the west side southwards several hundred miles..indicating they've moved that far.
Depending on the time frame you look at California isn't really all that active; the area where the 7.2 hit is very seismic, had a series of very similar quakes in 1992 and in several other years, and Magnitude 4-5 quakes in Southern California are pretty common; probably just a random fluke you had one of each within a few days
Damned Californians. They first ruined Montana - now Alaska?
CNN just mentioned another quake off N. California...???
Update time = Sun Jun 19 18:00:05 UTC 2005 Here are the earthquakes in the US10/37.47.-130.-120 map area, most recent at the top.
3.9 2005/06/19 14:12:12 40.973 -126.200 10.0 169 km (105 mi) WNW of Ferndale, CA 2.0 2005/06/19 11:57:44 38.805 -122.768 2.3 3 km ( 2 mi) ENE of The Geysers, CA 5.0 2005/06/19 09:27:19 40.320 -126.538 10.0 191 km (119 mi) W of Petrolia, CA 1.3 2005/06/19 09:22:20 38.390 -122.680 10.2 5 km ( 3 mi) NNE of Rohnert Park, CA 1.2 2005/06/19 09:13:34 38.743 -123.896 5.0 26 km ( 16 mi) SW of Point Arena, CA 1.9 2005/06/19 06:59:17 38.893 -122.448 6.8 14 km ( 8 mi) NE of Hidden Valley Lake, CA 2.1 2005/06/19 05:36:46 37.938 -122.758 23.4 7 km ( 4 mi) NW of Bolinas, CA 4.0 2005/06/19 05:35:49 40.623 -126.405 10.0 181 km (112 mi) W of Ferndale, CA 1.9 2005/06/18 17:13:34 38.393 -123.692 5.0 41 km ( 26 mi) WSW of Fort Ross, CA 1.0 2005/06/18 14:50:02 37.650 -121.948 12.9 6 km ( 4 mi) WSW of Pleasanton, CA 1.5 2005/06/18 14:12:26 38.795 -122.763 2.7 4 km ( 2 mi) E of The Geysers, CA 1.6 2005/06/18 13:05:16 37.803 -122.222 0.2 1 km ( 1 mi) NNE of Oakland, CA 2.3 2005/06/18 13:04:53 41.066 -123.251 2.5 39 km ( 24 mi) SSE of Somes Bar, CA 4.2 2005/06/18 11:44:59 40.776 -126.346 10.0 177 km (110 mi) W of Ferndale, CA |
|
|
|
Well, as an island; the Gulf of California will keep propagating northwards, getting longer, and Baja California and the part of California west of the San Andreas will eventually be an Island; however, most geologists believe the San Andreas will eventually track east of the Sierra Nevada through the State of Nevada making basically all of California an island as well.
This takes tens of millions of years, mind you.
Nothing "falls" into the ocean though as there's nothing to fall into; they're integral pieces of crust down to the mantle.
You probably should go to your local library or bookstore and check out or buy "Assembling California" and "Basin and Range" (about Nevada) by John McPhee, where all of this is explained to a general audience; he has a series of four books (also can be bought togther as "Annals of the Former World") covering his travels on Interstate 80 across the country with a series of prominent geologists ("In Suspect Terrain" dealing with Pennsylvania is now somewhat dated, however....the other three are quite good. There's also "Rising From the Plains" about Wyoming)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.