Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Restorer

If the memos weren't fake, why did the reporter destroy the originals? A good reporter would have kept the originals locked up somewhere.


36 posted on 06/19/2005 7:20:52 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: Peach

I did not say the memos were not fake. I said that an accurate copy of a real original memo is just as "real" as the original, although much more difficult to validate. Burden of proof should be on the one presenting the copied documents.


41 posted on 06/19/2005 7:24:31 AM PDT by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: Peach
If the memos weren't fake, why did the reporter destroy the originals?

Does it say that? The quote says he returned the originals to the source.

239 posted on 06/19/2005 11:59:55 AM PDT by Sir Gawain (When in doubt, cite the Commerce Clause)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: Peach

"A good reporter would have kept the originals locked up somewhere."

A 'good forger' would never have had any 'originals' to lock up.

A good forger should be locked up somewhere.


267 posted on 06/19/2005 1:28:00 PM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson