To: concerned about politics
"The Foreign Office yesterday acknowledged the documents were genuine but stressed they were only a snapshot of thinking at a particular time. Nor did they reflect the changes that took place over the following 12 months, in particular referring the issue to the UN, which the White House did at Mr Blair's behest, though it failed to get a second security council resolution authorising war."
There's the whole quote. DU is actively recruiting folks who use partial quotes to justify their position. Trust me, there's plenty of people over there that share your point of view.
288 posted on
06/19/2005 3:56:54 PM PDT by
saleman
To: mabelkitty
Far be it for me to question the media---but why do you think that we have heard NOTHING about this on Fox today?
They have had hours and hours to fill, and they have done a hundred shows on Natalee, and quite a few on Durbin, but no mention of this...
289 posted on
06/19/2005 4:00:12 PM PDT by
Txsleuth
(Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice)
To: saleman
DU is actively recruiting folks who use partial quotes to justify their position. Trust me, there's plenty of people over there that share your point of view.It was for sarcasm - as in "It's really real !! Experts said so!!" (Read the 2 posts I wrote before the link.)
Someone, like the Rather memo, actually claimed they were authentic. That's why I posted the link.
No. I don't believe they're real. Even if they were, I don't see what the big deal was anyway. It really makes them look quite immature doing stupid things like this.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson