You must have had one stuck on your shoe, because it's here.
He thinks destroyed fake ( this "I destroyed them" story is true because this "reporter" gave the Cub Scout sign) doccuments are going to now resurface. And regardless, copies of fake doccuments are legit because Blair, who denied the content somehow validated them by doing that.
I guess this "origional source" of the doccument will surface and make new origional Memo's, and they will be legit bewcause he allegedly made the origion fakes inthe first place.
How does that sound, that's rationallefty thinking isn't it?
"Blair, who denied the content somehow validated them by doing that"
Am I not making myself clear? He denied a certain interpretation of the content with reference to events that had happened after the content was written.
It takes a special kind of ability to use that to construct an argument that the memo did not ever exist!
How does attacking a socialist Prime Minister get you labelled a 'leftie' by the way?
It really is no big deal if even Ellis Henican thinks it isn't a smoking gun.
http://www.newsday.com/news/columnists/nyc-hen0619,0,295479.column?coll=ny-news-columnists
Don't get too excited over Downing Street memos