Skip to comments.
The U.S. 2nd Infantry Division: New Name, New Game(weird acronyms)
Chosun Ilbo ^
| 06/17/05
Posted on 06/19/2005 5:47:49 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; OahuBreeze; yonif; risk; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; MizSterious; ...
I will demand a bonus for putting up with those weird acronyms, UEx, UA, and others. Sounds like names of bad airline companies.
To: TigerLikesRooster
I need a paper and pencil
3
posted on
06/19/2005 5:51:17 AM PDT
by
nuconvert
(No More Axis of Evil by Christmas ! TLR) [there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business])
To: TigerLikesRooster
Who knows what the brass is thinking? I just hope that they don't change their patch. ![](http://tri.army.mil/LC/Ru/images/2nd_ID.gif)
![](http://home.swbell.net/rdbrown3/__hr_rdb3.jpg)
4
posted on
06/19/2005 5:52:08 AM PDT
by
rdb3
(What you want? Morning sickness or sickness from mourning? --Nick Cannon)
To: TigerLikesRooster
In the military, you have to get used to acronyms for everything. Army acronyms are Greek to me.
To: TigerLikesRooster
consists of the two MLRS battalions They're the expeditionary forces for the MILFs (Military Infiltration Logistical Force).
6
posted on
06/19/2005 5:55:29 AM PDT
by
martin_fierro
(Harsh not my mellow)
To: rdb3
I agree. Even though I was never in the 2nd ID, I did admire their history and their attachment to their name and their patch.
It seems a shame to lose the 2nd ID moniker also.
7
posted on
06/19/2005 6:01:21 AM PDT
by
libs_kma
(USA: The land of the Free....Because of the Brave!)
To: TigerLikesRooster
UEx, pundits further elucidate, is made up of three to five Units of Action, or UAs, which, they say, denotes an existing brigade-level combat unit.If it's a division, call it a division. If it's a brigade, call it a brigade. I can see it now: "The Big Red UEx".
To: TigerLikesRooster
Looks like the Army is trying to outdo the Navy in using acronyms. Though there's a long way to go before it can outdo acronyms like COMDESRON5DSDIV6DESLANT.
9
posted on
06/19/2005 6:06:55 AM PDT
by
xkaydet65
(Peace, Love, Brotherhood, and Firepower. And the greatest of these is Firepower!)
To: xkaydet65
Re #9
Is this a silly trick to confuse enemies?
To: rdb3
Maybe they meant to rename them TSOP by MFSB.
11
posted on
06/19/2005 6:15:21 AM PDT
by
rabidralph
(Michael Jackson will celebrate at Chuck E. Cheese's)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Weird acronyms? What weird acronyms?
12
posted on
06/19/2005 6:24:42 AM PDT
by
TADSLOS
(Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
To: TigerLikesRooster
This is just absolutely asinine.
This is the ultimate example of the kind of "good idea" that will be the ruin of the U.S. Army.
Next thing you know they'll take the headgear of a storied and elite unit and make everyone wear it.
To: nerdwithamachinegun
Marketing 101. Take an old idea, package it differently and call it new.
14
posted on
06/19/2005 6:36:30 AM PDT
by
TADSLOS
(Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
To: TADSLOS
It's BS.
They have two jobs.
1. Kill People
2. Break things
There is no marketing.
To: nerdwithamachinegun
Right on. "SECOND TO NONE!" bump.
16
posted on
06/19/2005 6:56:03 AM PDT
by
brushcop
(Remember SFC David Salie, a gentle giant of a man KIA (2-14-05) Iraq fighting for their liberty.)
To: nerdwithamachinegun
This is the ultimate example of the kind of "good idea" that will be the ruin of the U.S. Army. Actually, it's a very good idea and it's already helped my unit to overcome logistical support problems that would be next to impossible to solve under the old Army system.
I appreciate the service of the "older" folks here on FR, but just because something changes in the military from the way it was when you were in doesn't automatically make it a bad idea.
17
posted on
06/19/2005 7:02:13 AM PDT
by
Future Snake Eater
(The plan was simple, like my brother-in-law Phil. But unlike Phil, this plan just might work.)
To: nerdwithamachinegun
There is no marketing Oh, really? Explain recruiting then.
18
posted on
06/19/2005 7:02:52 AM PDT
by
TADSLOS
(Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
To: Future Snake Eater
If a name change improves logistical support, then don't you suppose that there was something else wrong?
My point is that the Army gratuitously changes names for no apparent reason or benefit.
To: TigerLikesRooster
20
posted on
06/19/2005 7:15:16 AM PDT
by
ArtyFO
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson