I'm very suspicious about this book. Is it really intended to "expose" Hillary for what she is?
Or did Klein intentionally include false information and innuendo (Bill's "rape" of Hillary)? So that, when Hillary is asked about true unethical conduct (cattle trading, Juanita Broderick, etc) in 2008, she can assert that the allegations have been "disproven" as "slanderous lies."
Hillary probably authorized the release of this book so she could again play the victim of the vast right winged conspiracy(even if the conspiracy is a made up one of her doing for sympathy)
"The Times also reported: "The book also has a patron in NewsMax.com, a Web site operated by a company that Mr. [Richard] Scaife has a stake in. The site has been offering the book free with subscriptions or renewals to NewsMax magazine."
And the loaded, biased book reviews of the NYTimes are done by a company that Pinch (I hope the VC shoot American soldiers) Sulzberger has a stake in. What is their point?
"'Hillary has good reason to be worried about this book,' the Web site says. 'Publishing insiders say the book and its revelations could destroy her bid to run for the presidency in 2008.'"
Which will make it good reading for more than 1/2 the country.
"Yet, Mrs. Clinton's aide said the book was "full of blatant and vicious fabrications." Smartly, Hillary and her husband in the past have rarely commented on books about them - including ones far more critical and personal."
Whoa! Starting the Kerry/Swiftboat defense/attack before the book has even had a chance to be ignored by the MSM? As Shakespeare said, "Methinks she dost protest too much."
When the namecalling, denials and insinuations start this early, you know they have hit her with the best weapon of all: the truth!
They'll never learn. :(