Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

N. Korea: Enveloped in a nuclear fog
Japan Times ^ | 06/17/05 | HARVEY STOCKWIN

Posted on 06/17/2005 6:25:36 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

Enveloped in a nuclear fog

By HARVEY STOCKWIN

HONG KONG -- Any day now the mere oscillation of a seismograph needle could precipitate uncertainties and greatly increase tensions: North Korea may become the second East Asian nation to shock the world with an underground nuclear test explosion, just as China did at Lop Nor in 1964. At the end of April the Bush administration informed the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna and several allied nations that an underground test was being prepared by the North Koreans and could take place as early as June. Governments made sure that their seismographs were ready to read any rumbles emanating from northeast North Korea. Prudently, the Americans were not categorical regarding dates.

Washington knows full well that, as ever, North Korea marches to its own unpredictable drumbeat. The current personification of the Kim communist dynastic dictatorship, Kim Jong Il, will decide on the propitious moment for that initial nuclear detonation, perhaps in consultation with one or two North Korean military leaders.

While North Korea's timing may be unpredictable, it seems fairly certain that the test will eventually take place, mainly because the two nations with the capacity to stop it do not wish to do so.

China could ruthlessly withhold its regime-sustaining aid to Pyongyang, but Beijing has decided that it much prefers a weak, albeit nuclear, client state on its border rather than risk North Korea's collapse and the emergence of a dynamic reunited Korea.

The United States could try to entice Kim with a generous package of concessions. But the Bush administration sees any such "gift" as encouraging nuclear proliferation as well as sustaining an obnoxious regime. Kim would still recognize that his retention of nuclear weapons was the only guarantee of continued American "generosity."

Additionally, Beijing now rejects insistent American pressure aimed at getting China to fully exert its influence over North Korea. For nearly a year now, China had been either unwilling or unable to even get North Korea to resume participation in the six-party talks (the two Koreas, Russia, Japan, China and the United States) -- the object of which has been to reinstate the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.

But even if, as some diplomats currently hope, a fourth round of six-nation talks does take place, it will probably only mean that a North Korean nuclear test will be delayed for a while.

U.S. spy satellites detect North Korean tunnel-building and excavation in a northeastern region in the vicinity of Kilju. One such excavation has been filled in, consistent with preparations for the explosion of an underground test.

Yet all those earth-moving preparations could be a Pyongyang ruse. Remember the huge underground cavern that the Clinton administration considered to be part of North Korea's nuclear threat? Pyongyang received a lot of aid in return for permitting a U.S. inspection, which discovered that the cavern was completely empty.

The North Koreans would probably like nothing better than to once again prove American intelligence wrong by first sending misleading signals, and then showing that nothing was there. Conversely, having completely missed the signs in 1998 that India and Pakistan were about to conduct nuclear tests, American intelligence could now be overcompensating for that failure.

There are of course disincentives for Kim. He cannot be sure how neighboring nations will react to any nuclear tests. At a time when Pyongyang is significantly increasing its still modest amount of trade with Russia, China and South Korea, it may not want to risk yet another economic setback. The North Koreans are heavily indebted to Beijing for food and fuel aid, and may fear that, after a nuclear test, China might reverse itself and end this source of sustenance.

Yet the reasons why a North Korean nuclear test will probably take place, any day now, are much more compelling. The fact that the North Koreans recently unloaded 8,000 fuel rods from the Yongbyon reactor is suggestive.

Had the North Koreans waited another year, the yield of weapons-grade plutonium from those rods would have been much greater. To do so now, and accept a lesser yield, could indicate a degree of political impatience on Kim's part as he hurries to replenish his limited stock of weapons-grade plutonium, before exploding part of it.

Any fears Pyongyang has of Chinese pressure to prevent a test appear to be groundless even though the Americans have asked Beijing to apply it. Spokesman Liu Jianchao has rejected any thought of sanctions if North Korea conducts a test, as China "is not in favor of exerting pressure or imposing sanctions on North Korea. We believe that such measures are not necessarily effective."

Perhaps the best example of China's contrary view came May 11 when the banner story in the China Daily urged direct contact between the U.S. and North Korea as the best way to solve the nuclear impasse -- the very policy option Bush has consistently rejected.

Since the North Koreans must know of these Sino-American differences by now, a nuclear test may recommend itself as a way of increasing a Sino-American rift.

Yet the more compelling reason a North Korean nuclear test is probably inevitable is that it is the only way to make its long-standing nuclear diplomacy credible, and to ensure that North Korea is taken seriously by otherwise hostile states. Kim almost certainly notes that India and Pakistan have been taken much more seriously by the U.S. since their 1998 nuclear tests.

Above all, a nuclear North Korea fits Kim's vision of realpolitik on the Korean Peninsula. Pyongyang has steadily pursued nuclear development since the Eisenhower administration used the nuclear threat to secure Russian and Chinese compliance with a Korean armistice in 1953, thereby depriving the Kim Dynasty of any chance of establishing one Korea under its rule during the last 52 years.

At the very least, Kim believes that the undisputed advent of a nuclear North Korea will establish a better balance of power with an economically stronger but politically deferential South Korea.

Kim believes that once he has conclusively demonstrated that he possesses nuclear capability, the U.S. and Japan, and even China, will be far more respectful, fearing that he may place an atomic warhead on top of his intermediate-range as well as his intercontinental, ballistic missiles.

While a nuclear test explosion may make sense from Kim's point of view, it seems unlikely to enhance the long-term stability and prosperity of East Asia.

Harvey Stockwin has been reporting on developments on the Korean Peninsula since taking up residence in Hong Kong in 1976.

The Japan Times: June 17, 2005


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 6partytalk; china; japan; nkorea; nuke; test

1 posted on 06/17/2005 6:25:37 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; OahuBreeze; yonif; risk; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; MizSterious; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 06/17/2005 6:25:59 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Nothing happens in NK without the PRC's approval.


3 posted on 06/17/2005 6:51:33 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Re #3

China had better be careful. U.S. could use Falun Gong and Christians against them. Both have now become underground dissident organizations which are nationwide and entrenched.

All U.S. has to to is to champion human right in China.

4 posted on 06/17/2005 6:57:25 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Enveloped in a nuclear fog

They keep it up and the may be enveloped in a mushroom cloud.

5 posted on 06/17/2005 7:04:55 AM PDT by softwarecreator (Facts are to liberals as holy water is to vampires)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: softwarecreator
Re #5

We may call it "radioactive cloud."

6 posted on 06/17/2005 7:09:35 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
If we really believe/know that Kim is about to detonate a device, perhaps we should "steal his thunder" by dropping one of our own right on his test site.

Now, I know we would never do such a thing -- but perhaps we should "play hardball" with these petty perps occasionally...

7 posted on 06/17/2005 8:51:19 AM PDT by TXnMA (ATTN, ACLU & NAACP: There's no constitutionally protected right to NOT be offended -- Shove It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA
Re #7

As a preliminary, test-fire a new missile from California coast to 50 miles from the N. Korean shore near their missile base. Use MIRV.

The do an American nuke test somewhere in Nevada which is for developing bunker-busting mini-nukes.

8 posted on 06/17/2005 9:00:58 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Is there a possiblity that China could perhaps
"loan" a small device to NK for an underground "test".
This would give their surrogate the nuclear validity it
seeks, would cost china very little, provided it was kept
secret, and would keep the scam going?

Just curious, trying to think inscrutably.


9 posted on 06/17/2005 9:16:04 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tet68
Re #9

In all likelihood, China is not keen on Japan going nuclear, which N. Korean nuke test provoke.

N. Korean nuclear test will inevitably lead to the rapid rise of another military superpower in E. Asia, Japan. Japan could even have a fiery right-wing figure as its prime minister, Ishihara Shintaro. Taking on U.S. and Japan would be more than China can handle.

10 posted on 06/17/2005 9:25:16 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Isn't that what is going to happen anyway?
It's possible this is all a bluff but there would
be much loss of face if it turned out to be one.


11 posted on 06/17/2005 9:52:03 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tet68
Re #11

Well, the problem is that China would end up facing the powerful enemy before they are ready.

12 posted on 06/17/2005 9:57:18 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; All

Hey Tiger I woke up this morning to Reuters wire Little Kim promise with his finger cross that he plan go back to six nation nuke talks

So what up with that


13 posted on 06/17/2005 10:57:04 AM PDT by SevenofNine (Not everybody in, it for truth, justice, and the American way,"=Det Lennie Briscoe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SevenofNine
Re #13

He would if America grants him all of his wishes, which may not be likely to happen.

14 posted on 06/17/2005 11:03:20 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I think DUbya get tired of his Chia Pet s***t I doubt that Dubya going granted all wishes that Kim wanted NO WAY


15 posted on 06/17/2005 2:32:54 PM PDT by SevenofNine (Not everybody in, it for truth, justice, and the American way,"=Det Lennie Briscoe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson