I dare any local, state or federal agency to declare such a determination.
There is a limit to what even American sheep will tolerate.
No damage was done to persons or property. The precedents have been clearly set: this is a form of expression which has been tested in thousands of cases since the wonderful sixties.
Apply those precedents selectively at your own risk.
Was it a hate crime when someone put a crucifix in urine?
What a sickening double standard. Muslims in this country, for the most part, are just laying low until their numbers increase enough so that they can start pushing their weight around & forcing the rest of us to adhere to their "values".
After reflection, I realize that I was mistakenly directing my ire at "Kevin Foust, the agent in charge of the Roanoke FBI office". He answered a stupid question the best way he could.
There is no reporter claiming credit for writing the crap to convey a totally bogus line of thinking.
It was the stupid person assembling the story who asked the leading question. We see that technique being used all the time at news conferences.
At this point it ceased being "news" and became something not too far from fraud.
The intention was clearly to convey the impression that the authorities were contemplating the "hate crime" angle.
Totally fraud. Will the MSM idiots ever get it?
The jig is up!