Mmmm. Very good points, nice to have a real male point of view. These sub-men are 'men' like Ward Churchill. I've met a few guys like this, they seem almost guilt-ridden to be male. And so they go overboard to prove how sympathetic and useful (useful idiots, really) they are to the feminists. Ultimately these men are somehow considered 'lesser' by the womyn they prop up but they both seem ok with that, as a new 'natural' order (I heard that from a female professor also). Some metrosexuals are knowingly serving as useful idiots to the ultra-feminists, but others do indeed seem blissfully unaware. As to the male side, are the males who go along, equal to the females or just lackeys? Because the gay men, although equally metrosexual, seem to benefit in ways the hetero metrosexuals don't.
"As to the male side, are the males who go along, equal to the females or just lackeys?"
I think alot of homosexual males probably have just as much a stake in this as the feminists, if not more. Some of the metrosexuals are just "useful idiots" though that are fitting an urban cultural norm.
"Because the gay men, although equally metrosexual, seem to benefit in ways the hetero metrosexuals don't."
Yeah, gay men probably have more stake in this than anybody since it makes their gender-confusion not only acceptable, but the "norm". The metrosexuals are just the embodiment of the "norm" that the feminists and gays are trying to create. In short, the decay of western manhood.